Composite electrodes provide an effective and cheap way to utilise a wide range of carbon materials to make electrodes. More recently thermoplastics have been widely used as the binder to make carbon composite electrodes, as varying fabrication approaches, such as 3D printing, can make complex electrode geometries. However, there is a clear need to understand how the electrochemical performance of different carbon allotrope materials varies when made into sensors. We accessed PLA thermoplastic filaments containing carbon black, graphite, graphene, multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and carbon fiber using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Electrodes were made in thin disc electrodes using molding to negate the influence of geometry on electrochemical activity and also in dome shapes using 3D printing to understand the impact of geometry. MWCNT/PLA electrodes had the lowest sensitivity for measurement of serotonin. Graphene/PLA electrodes had the greatest sensitivity and lowest limit of detection for the measurement of serotonin. However, graphene/PLA and graphite/PLA had the poorest resolution in the fabrication of dome-shaped electrodes. CB/PLA dome electrodes were the most uniform and had the best print resolution. CB/PLA electrodes also had the best stability for sustained monitoring of serotonin. Electrodes made from all carbon materials showed good electron transfer kinetics for redox probes on molded electrodes, but when dome electrodes were made using 3D printing, poor electron transfer kinetics were observed on all materials. Overall, our study highlights key differences in the electrochemical activity of different carbon allotropes and the impact fabrication of complex electrode geometries can have on performance. This interplay between geometry and electrochemical performance is critical in designing carbon electrodes for a wide range of applications.
Composite electrodes are an effective and cheap way to utilise a wide range of carbon materials to make electrodes. More recently thermoplastics have been widely used as the binder to make carbon composite electrodes, as varying fabrication approaches, such as 3D printing, can make highly reproducible electrodes. However, there is a clear need to understand how the electrochemical performance of different carbon allotrope materials varies when made into sensors. We accessed polylactic acid (PLA) thermoplastic filaments containing carbon black, graphite, graphene, multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and carbon fiber using various electrochemical techniques. Graphite/PLA and graphene/PLA electrodes showed the best electron transfer kinetics. Graphene/PLA electrodes had the greatest sensitivity and lowest limit of detection for the measurement of serotonin. CB/PLA was least prone to electrode fouling from oxidative by-product generated from the oxidation of serotonin. 3D printing was used to make various carbon allotrope materials into complex shapes to evaluate the batch uniformity of the printed parts. Of all the materials explored, CB/PLA had the best resolution and batch uniformity when compared to PLA. Overall, our study highlights that the type of the carbon allotrope plays as much influence as amount of carbon on the electrochemical performance of carbon thermoplastic electrodes. These findings will provide significant guidance on the appropriate choice of carbon thermoplastic composite materials when designing electrodes for a wide range of applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.