MethodsIn 5 european clinics, 62 patients (79 % female, mean age 85.3 years) suffering from an osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture (AO 31) were treated with the augmented PFNA ® . The primary objectives were assessment of activities of daily living, pain and mobility. Furthermore, the X-rays were analyzed for the cortical thickness index, changes of the trabecular structure around the cement and the hip joint space. Results The mean follow-up time was 15.3 months. We observed callus healing in all cases. The surgical complication rate was 3.2 % with no complication related to the cement augmentation. A mean volume of 3.8 ml of cement was injected and no complication was reported due to this procedure. 59.9 % reached their prefracture mobility level until follow-up. The mean hip joint space did not change significantly until follow-up and there were no signs of osteonecrosis in the follow-up X-rays. Furthermore, no blade migration was assessed. Conclusion This study makes us believe that the standardized augmentation of the PFNA with a perforated blade is a safe method to treat pertrochanteric femoral fractures. It leads to good functional results and is not associated with cartilage or bone necrosis.
Background: Hip fracture patients are at a higher risk for death compared to age-matched controls. While the reasons for this increased mortality risk are incompletely understood, medical comorbidities and associated medication prescribing likely play an important role in patient outcomes. Altered drug metabolism, polypharmacy and diminished physiologic reserve may all lead to adverse drug reactions and adverse outcomes. Additionally, underprescribing of efficacious medications may deprive older patients of potential therapeutic benefits. Objective: The aim of our trial was to estimate the impact of inappropriate medication prescribing on the long-term outcome of older hip fracture patients. Methods: The present study is a retrospective cohort study. We included all hip fracture patients who were consecutively admitted to our department from 2000 to 2004. We used the previously published STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria to assess the appropriateness of medication prescribing with an additional focus on osteoporosis medications and the total number of prescriptions. Prescriptions meeting STOPP and START criteria were considered ‘positive items' and correlated with outcomes. Mortality was assessed by cross-referencing with the national death registry of the Tyrolean Institute of Epidemiology. Results: During the study period, a total of 457 patients with hip fracture (mean age 80.61 ± 7.07 years; range 65-98) were evaluated. The mean number of positive combined STOPP and START items per patient was 2 ± 1.3, with ranges from 0 to 6 (STOPP items), 0 to 4 (START items) and 0 to 7 (combined STOPP/START items). Only 44 (9.6%) of patients had no positive STOPP or START items. The mean number of positive items (STOPP, START and combined) was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years was lowest in the subjects with 1 or 0 positive items (20.5%; n = 35) and highest among those with >3 positive items (44.4%; n = 63). Inappropriate medication prescribing remained an independent risk factor with an odds ratio of 1.28 (1.07-1.52) after adjustment for sex, age, activities of daily living, comorbidities and nutrition status. Conclusion: Inappropriate medication prescribing is an independent predictor of long-term mortality in older hip fracture patients. It increases the relative risk of mortality in older hip fracture patients by 28%.
Background: Fractures of the distal femur comprise 4% to 6% of all femoral fractures. Elderly patients are predisposed to lowenergy fractures due to osteoporosis. Treatment of these fractures in the elderly group remains a challenge. Our hypothesis is that locking plates inserted with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques will produce better results compared to those inserted by open technique. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of MIPO technique using locking plates in the elderly patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 elderly patients (mean age 73 years) with distal femur fractures treated using the MIPO technique (2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) were reviewed retrospectively. Parameters analyzed included classification of fracture, time to fracture union, knee range of motion, functional knee score (Knee Society Score-Functional) at 6 months, and other significant complications. One patient was lost to follow-up. Results: In all, 88% of the fractures were extraarticular. The mean time to union was 13.48 (range: 8-28) weeks. Mean range of motion achieved at 6 months and beyond was 100 ranging from 0 to 30 (extension) to 90 to 140 (flexion). Functional knee scores at 6 months from fixation were satisfactory (mean score 88.8). There were no cases of implant failure, nonunion, and infection. In all, 6 (25%) patients developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the early postoperative period, all of which were below the level of the knee joint. Conclusion: Locking plates inserted using MIPO techniques in elderly patients with distal femur fractures appear to be promising based on clinical outcome measurements. However, there was a high incidence of DVT noted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.