The paper captures the effect of structure and the applicability of compaction models using the cold compaction of a TiH2-SS316L composite powder prepared by high energy mechanical milling. The composite blend was cold pressed uniaxially to pressures of up to 1250MPa. The compressibility of the composite blend was evaluated by fitting the experimental data to the most commonly used compaction models of Heckel, the Kawakita-Lüdde, the Cooper-Eaton, the Ge, and the Panelli-Filho compaction equations. Among the models, the Kawakita-Lüdde and Cooper-Eaton models fitted the experimental data very well with a good correlation (the correlation coefficient greater than 0.99) throughout the entire pressure range under investigation. The nature and mechanisms responsible for the densification during cold compaction are discussed. The Heckel, Ge, Panelli-Filho, and Cooper-Eaton model analysis showed that the dominant compaction mechanisms for composite blend were rearrangement of particles followed by elastic and plastic deformation. The results are discussed by way of a comprehensive model intercomparison study of the cold compaction behaviour using existing models.
A brief background to compaction equations and their application to titanium powder is presented. The behavior and mechanisms of densification in selected titanium powders is critically analyzed by means of a comprehensive inter-model comparison of existing compaction equations. The results are discussed in terms of the comparative evaluation of cold uniaxial compaction tests of sponge Ti, CP TiH 2 , CP Grade 2 Ti, and TiH 2 -SS316L nanocomposite powder samples, which were conducted at applied compaction pressures of up to 1250 MPa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.