BackgroundTo compare scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a wide angle viewing system (WAVS) for uncomplicated phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).MethodsThe medical records of patients with uncomplicated phakic RRD were retrospectively reviewed. Eyes with pseudophakic or attached fovea were excluded. Patients treated with SB were classified as group B, and PPV using WAVS as group V. Primary success rate, visual acuity (VA), macular complications, and sustained subretinal fluid (SRF) were compared between groups.ResultsSeventy-two eyes were included in group B and 57 eyes in group V. Group B had better preoperative VA (1.38 ± 0.87 vs 1.84 ± 0.97 in LogMAR, P = 0.010), but worse final VA (0.51 ± 0.48 vs 0.30 ± 0.23, P = 0.012) than group V. The primary success rate of 94.7 % in group V was higher than 77.8 % in group B (P = 0.010). Final success rate was 100 % in both groups. There was no significant difference in macular complications between groups (P = 0.087). Sustained SRF was found in 22 eyes in group B (38.6 %), while only two eyes in group V exhibited sustained SRF (2.8 %, P < 0.001).ConclusionsPars plana vitrectomy using WAVS was more efficacious than SB for treating uncomplicated phakic RRD.
The postoperative ganglion cell layer was found to be correlated to postoperative VA more consistently than the photoreceptor layer after ERM surgery. The outer retinal damage was a determining factor in the poor VA group.
Purpose:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of 3% diquafosol in dry eye patients aged around 60 years. Methods: In total, 68 patients with dry eye syndrome were divided by age into 2 groups, Group I (29 patients, 29 eyes) under the age of 60 years and Group II (39 patients, 39 eyes) over the age of 60 years. To evaluate the effectiveness of 3% diquafosol, we measured the tear film break-up time (tBUT), performed the Schirmer I test, and used the corneal staining score as an objective indicator and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score as a subjective indicator at initial visit, 1 month, 2 months, and 4 months. Results: Significant improvements in the tear film break-up time, Schirmer I test, and OSDI were observed at 1,2, and 4 months after treatment with 3% diquafosol tetrasodium in both dry eye groups, but significant difference in the corenal staining score were not observed (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant improvement between the 2 age groups in the tBUT at 1 month (p = 0.012), 2 months (p = 0.005), and 4 months (p = 0.005), and improvements in the Schirmer I test between the 2 age groups at 1 month (p = 0.015), 2 months (p = 0.005), and 4 months (p = 0.005) were also observed. But, there was no significant difference in the corneal staining score and OSDI score between the 2 groups at 1, 2, and 4 months (p > 0.05).
Purpose: To report a case of delayed idiopathic macular hole closure after vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas tamponade. Case summary: A 69-year-old female complained of visual disturbance in her left eye. At presentation, her visual acuity was 20/100 in the left eye. Fundus examination and optical coherence tomography revealed a full-thickness macular hole 489 μm in diameter as well as posterior vitreous detachment. Hence, vitrectomy, concurrent cataract surgery, internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade were performed. One month postoperatively, the hole remained unclosed, although decreased in size to 378 μm. At 2 months, cystoid macular edema developed and postoperatively the hole diameter decreased gradually to 311 μm, 252 μm and 156 μm at 2, 3, and 5 months, respectively. Finally, the hole was closed upon the resolution of macular edema at 9 months. However, the visual acuity of 20/100 remained unchanged. Conclusions: Delayed closure of holes which may be related to cystoid macular edema, can develop after macular hole surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.