Phosphite (; Phi), a reduced form of phosphate (; Pi), is widely marketed as either a fungicide or fertilizer or sometimes as a biostimulant. This is confusing for both distributors and growers. The present paper explores data from various studies to clarify that Phi does not provide plant P nutrition and thus cannot complement or substitute Pi at any rate. In addition, Phi itself does not have any beneficial effect on the growth of healthy plants, regardless of whether it is applied alone or in combination with Pi at different ratios or different rates. The effect of Phi on plants is not consistent, but is strongly dependent on the Pi status of the plants. In most cases, the deleterious effect of Phi is evident in Pi‐starved, but not Pi‐sufficient, plants. Plants fertilized with Pi allowing for approximately 80–90% of its maximum growth might still be at risk of the effect. This negative effect becomes more pronounced under more seriously Pi‐deficient conditions. Although a number of studies have shown positive crop responses to Phi, these responses are likely to be attributable to the suppression of plant diseases by Phi and/or to Pi formed from oxidation of Phi by microbes. In addition, indirectly providing P by Phi‐to‐Pi oxidation is not an effective means of supplying P to plants compared with Pi fertilizer. An understanding of these issues will aid the right selection of fertilizer as well as minimize the harmful effects of Phi use on crops.

Soil and hydroponic culture experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of phosphite (Phi) as phosphorus (P) fertilizer via root and foliar applications on the growth and P supply of komatsuna. In both experiments, root P treatments were combinations of Phi and phosphate (Pi) at different Pi:Phi ratios, for a total of high P level (92 mg P pot −1 ; the soil experiment) or low P level (0.05 mM P; the hydroponic experiment). Foliar P treatments were deionized water (control), a Pi solution and a Phi solution at low concentration of 0.05% P 2 O 5 . In both experiments, shoot dry weight of plants significantly decreased as Pi:Phi ratio decreased. In the soil experiment, plants grew abnormally at a Pi:Phi ratio of 25:75 and died when P was applied to soil entirely as Phi form (0:100 treatment). In the hydroponic experiment, no visible damage was found in shoot but root growth was strongly inhibited with severe damage symptoms at low Pi:Phi ratios. Total P concentration in plant decreased significantly with decreasing Pi:Phi ratio, especially in the hydroponic experiment. Foliar application of Phi although greatly increased total P of plants compared to that of Pi in both experiments, it did not improve but further decreased plant growth at low Pi:Phi ratios in the soil experiment and at all Pi:Phi ratios in the hydroponic experiment. The results of this study clearly indicated that Phi could not be used as P fertilizer by komatsuna plants via both application methods and could not substitute P at any rate at either low or high level. No beneficial effect of Phi was detected even when it was applied at low rate or applied in combination with Pi at different ratios. The effects of Phi were strongly dependent on the P nutrition status of plants; and plants that were not sufficiently fertilized with Pi may become vulnerable to Phi even at low levels.

Phosphite (Phi) may potentially supply phosphorus (P) nutrition to plants and is widely marketed as a super P fertilizer for many crops. This study investigated the effects of Phi on growth and P nutrition in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). High-rate foliar application experiments designed to evaluate the phytotoxicity and P nutritional potential of different Phi formulations by foliar application at two rates (0.15 and 0.3% P 2 O 5 ) showed that all Phi formulations did not improve plant growth under different available P-soils, but rather significantly decreased shoot dry weight (DW) at the higher rate. In two other soil and hydroponic experiments, Phi was foliar applied at a low rate (0.05% P 2 O 5 ) and root P treatments were combinations of Phi and phosphate (Pi) at different Pi : Phi ratios for a high P level (the soil experiment) or a low P level (the hydroponic experiment). In both experiments, shoot DW decreased markedly as the Pi : Phi ratios decreased from 100:0 to 0:100 and Phi foliar application did not improve plant growth. In the soil experiment, plants grew poorest at 0:100, but grew well when both Phi and Pi were applied at a high rate of 115 mg P pot -1 , indicating that at this level Phi had a negative effect on only severely P-deficient plants. Root growth of no Pi-fertilized plants was strongly inhibited by Phi from either root or foliar application. In both experiments, P concentration drastically decreased with decreasing Pi : Phi ratios from 100:0 to 0:100, but increased substantially with foliar application of Phi compared with Pi, suggesting that Phi was absorbed poorly by the roots, but was well absorbed by the leaves compared to Pi. We conclude that Phi cannot be used as a P fertilizer for spinach via either root or foliar applications at low or high levels, and also that Phi has no beneficial effect on the growth of spinach. As Phi is now widely marketed as a P fertilizer for many crops, care should be taken in selecting Phi as a P fertilizer for a given crop.

A 2-year pot experiment (2005)(2006) was conducted in a greenhouse using rice variety Manawthuka on high-fertility Kasuya soil and low-fertility Futsukaichi soil. Fermented cow manure (CM) and poultry manure (PM) were applied as organic nitrogen (N) sources. In every manure application, 20 kg urea ha -1 was also applied at basal. Dry matter, grain yield, and nitrogen uptake were greater in PM than CM and significantly greater in Kasuya soil. In 2006, they increased in Futsukaichi soil but decreased in Kasuya soil. Apparent nitrogen recovery was greater in PM than in CM and increased in both soils in 2006 because of residual benefits from manure application. The apparent phosphorus recovery was greater in CM than in PM; however, large plant phosphorus accumulation was observed in PM. In both soils, the efficiency of CM is very low, and CM-only application is unlikely to achieve an optimal rice yield in the short term.

The phylogenetic diversity of cowpea root-nodulating bacteria in the South-West of Japan was investigated using 60 isolates. Seeds of cowpea were aseptically sown in vermiculite and inoculated with a suspension of Cowpea Soil (CS) or Bean Soil (BS) or without a soil suspension as a control. CS and BS were collected from the Kyushu University's farm (Japan) at sites where cowpea and bean, respectively, have been cultivated previously. Based on an analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequence between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, 56 isolates were assigned to the genus Bradyrhizobium, while one isolate was found to be closely related to the genus Ralstonia. The ITS-based phylogeny showed 53 isolates, 2 isolates, and 1 isolate, to be closely related to B. yuanmingense, B. elkanii and B. japonicum, respectively, suggesting that B. yuanmingense strains predominated in the soils. Among the isolates tested, B. yuanmingense TSC10 and TTC9 exhibited a greater symbiotic activity and could be considered efficient inoculants for cowpea.