The performance of current Li–air batteries is greatly limited by critical obstacles such as electrolyte decomposition, high charging overpotentials, and limited cycle life. Thus, much effort is devoted to fundamental studies to understand the mechanisms of discharge/charge processes and overcome the above-mentioned obstacles. In particular, the search for new stable electrolytes is vital for long-lasting and highly cyclable batteries. The highly reactive lithium superoxide intermediate (LiO2) produced during discharge process can react with the electrolyte and produce a variety of byproducts that will shorten battery life span. To study this degradation mechanism, we investigated oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in highly concentrated electrolyte solutions of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide (Li[TFSA])/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). On the basis of rotating ring disk electrode measurements, we showed that LiO2 dissolution can be limited by increasing lithium salt concentration over 2.3 mol dm–3. Our Raman results suggested that this phenomenon can be related to lack of free DMSO molecules and increasing DMSO–Li+ interactions with higher Li+ concentration. X-ray diffraction measurements for the products of ORR suggested that the side reaction of DMSO with Li2O2 and/or LiO2 could be suppressed by decreasing the solubility of LiO2 in highly concentrated electrolytes.
A solvate ionic liquid (SIL) was compared with a conventional organic solvent for the electrolyte of the Li-O battery. An equimolar mixture of triglyme (G3) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide (Li[TFSA]), and a G3/Li[TFSA] mixture containing excess glyme were chosen as the SIL and the conventional electrolyte, respectively. Charge behavior and accompanying gas evolution of the two electrolytes was investigated by electrochemical mass spectrometry (ECMS). From the linear sweep voltammetry performed on an as-prepared cell, we demonstrate that the SIL has a higher oxidative stability than the conventional electrolyte and, furthermore, offers the advantage of lower volatility, which would benefit an open-type lithium-O cell design. Moreover, CO evolution during galvanostatic charge was less in the SIL, which implies less side reaction. However, O evolution during charge did not reach the theoretical value in either of the two electrolytes. Several mass spectral fragments were generated during the charge process, which provided evidence for side reactions of glyme-based electrolytes. We further relate the difference in observed discharge product morphology for these electrolytes to the solubility of the superoxide intermediate, determined by rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) measurements.
The use of LiI as redox mediator for the charge reaction in nonaqueous Li/O 2 cells has been widely studied recently, as a possible means to fulfill the great promise of the Li/O 2 system as a high energy density "beyond Li-ion" battery. In this work, we highlight the importance of considering the redox potential for both the I − /I 3 − and I 3 − /I 2 redox couples and how the electrolyte solvent (here tetraglyme (G4) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) and concentration (here 1.0 and 2.8 M) have a profound influence on these potentials. Through a combination of galvanostatic cycling, electrochemical mass spectrometry, and cyclic voltammetry, we thus consider the influence of solvent and electrolyte concentration on both the redox mediation and redox shuttle processes and suggest that this important aspect must be considered for further studies with mediators in Li/O 2 and related systems. We demonstrate that, in our system, 100 mM LiI in 1.0 M Li[TFSA]/DMSO provides the most effective redox mediation among the electrolytes we have studied but conversely exhibits the highest degree of redox shuttling (in the absence of O 2 ). The balance between effective limitation of redox shuttle and ease of mediator diffusion to discharge products is of great importance and should be considered in any future cell design utilizing a mediator.
This study reports a reversible oxygen reduction–oxygen evolution reaction (ORR–OER) that uses a solvate ionic liquid, [Li(triglyme)1][NTf2], as an electrolyte for a rechargeable Li–air (O2) battery. Significantly, it was found that the reversibility and capacity retention for ORR–OER in the solvate ionic liquid was greatly improved with a decrease in the ORR discharge depth; the discharge to 2.2 V vs. Li/Li+ gave much better reversibility than that to 2.0 V vs. Li/Li+.
Three-dimensionally macroporous nitrogen-doped carbon materials are fabricated via carbonization of an ionic-liquid-based small molecule precursor, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide, using opal silica colloidal crystals as ah ard template. As compared to traditional polymerizable monomer-based precursors such as furfuryl alcohol, the entire process involving ionic liquid does not require any acid catalyst and prepolymerization step. More importantly,n itrogen heteroatomsc an be incorporated into the carbon skeleton in situ. The obtained inverse opal carbonsp ossess large surface areas and pore volumes, and high nitrogen content. When acting as metal-free electrocatalysts, the inverse opal carbonse xhibit high catalytic activity and selectivityt owards the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline electrolyte, much better than that of the furfuryl-alcohol-derived inverse opal carbon and close to that of commercial Pt/C catalysts.The oxygen reduction reaction( ORR) is ak ey process in fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Platinumn anoparticless upported on high-surface-area carbon materials (Pt/C) are the most widely used electrocatalysts for ORR to date. However,h igh cost, the sluggish kinetics of the ORR process, and an intolerance to fuel crossover have limitedt he scalingu po fc orresponding renewable energy technologiesu sing Pt/C catalysts.[1] Consequently, there have been tremendous efforts on finding replacements for Pt-based catalysts. Amongt hese candidates, N-doped carbon materials as alternative metal-free catalysts are of particular interest.[2] Conjugation between the lone pair of the nitrogen heteroatom and p system of the carbon lattices results in structural irregularities in hexagonal carbon rings, imparting new catalytic sites and ah igh catalytic activity.[3] Despite the high performance of N-doped carbons, their catalytic activities are still far from satisfactory.T his is partly because of their relatively low nitrogen content as well as al ow surface utilization, resulting from randomly formed inaccessible narrow,s mall mesopores. Thus, aw ell-defineda nd continuousp orous structure with ar elativelyl arge surface area, large pore volume, regularp ores, and high nitrogen content is more preferable for high electrocatalytic activity.In this respect, inverse opal carbons (IOCs), which possess cage-like, orderedm acropores and three-dimensionally interconnected windows, could meet these requirements.[4] The large surface area and uniform pore size may facilitate the access of reactants to the active sites and allow ag ood reactant flux, resulting in high catalytic activity.I OC is technologically important for variousa pplicationss uch as photonic crystals, catalysis,s ensing, and separation techniques. For example, it has been previously reported that graphitic carbon nitride supported on three-dimensional interconnected macroporous carbon showed catalytic activity towards ORR comparable to that of commercial Pt/C.[5] Additionally,t he graphitic nature of the macroporous carbon could improve...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.