A multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the main prognostic factors driving survival after radioembolization using yttrium‐90–labeled resin microspheres in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at eight European centers. In total, 325 patients received a median activity of 1.6 GBq between September 2003 and December 2009, predominantly as whole‐liver (45.2%) or right‐lobe (38.5%) infusions. Typically, patients were Child‐Pugh class A (82.5%), had underlying cirrhosis (78.5%), and had good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG 0‐1; 87.7%), but many had multinodular disease (75.9%) invading both lobes (53.1%) and/or portal vein occlusion (13.5% branch; 9.8% main). Over half had advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging (BCLC C, 56.3%) and one‐quarter had intermediate staging (BCLC B, 26.8%). The median overall survival was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval, 10.9‐15.7), which varied significantly by disease stage (BCLC A, 24.4 months [95% CI, 18.6‐38.1 months]; BCLC B, 16.9 months [95% CI, 12.8‐22.8 months]; BCLC C, 10.0 months [95% CI, 7.7‐10.9 months]). Consistent with this finding , survival varied significantly by ECOG status, hepatic function (Child‐Pugh class, ascites, and baseline total bilirubin), tumor burden (number of nodules, alpha‐fetoprotein), and presence of extrahepatic disease. When considered within the framework of BCLC staging, variables reflecting tumor burden and liver function provided additional prognostic information. The most significant independent prognostic factors for survival upon multivariate analysis were ECOG status, tumor burden (nodules >5), international normalized ratio >1.2, and extrahepatic disease. Common adverse events were: fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain. Grade 3 or higher increases in bilirubin were reported in 5.8% of patients. All‐cause mortality was 0.6% and 6.8% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Conclusion: This analysis provides robust evidence of the survival achieved with radioembolization, including those with advanced disease and few treatment options. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;)

BackgroundRadioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-DKFZ-617 PSMA (Lu-PSMA) (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is a novel targeted therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. We analysed retrospectively the early side effects and the response rate in the first patients, who received a therapy with Lu-PSMA in our departments.MethodsRLT was performed in ten hormone- and/or chemo-refractory patients with distant metastases and progressive disease (mean age 73.5 years). 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/CT was performed in all patients prior to RLT. The median PSA level prior to the therapy was 298.5 ng/ml (range 5–853 ng/ml). All patients received CBC, renal and liver function tests the day before and 2 days after application (mean administered activity 5.6 GBq, range 4.1–6.1 GBq), followed by further tests every 2 weeks. All patients were contacted by telephone every week regarding side effects or any positive and negative changes.ResultsEight weeks after the therapy, seven patients (70 %) experienced a PSA decline, of whom six experienced more than 30 % and five more than 50 %. Three patients showed a progressive disease according to the PSA increase. No patient experienced any side effects immediately after injection of Lu-PSMA. Relevant hematotoxicity (grade 3 or 4) occurred 7 weeks after the administration in just one patient. The same patient showed a leucopenia grade 2. Two patients showed a disturbance of only 1 hematologic cell line, whereas one patient showed a reduction of grades 1 and 2 in leucocytes and thrombocytes, respectively. Six patients did not show any hematotoxicity during the 8 weeks after therapy. There was no relevant nephrotoxicity (grade 3 or 4).ConclusionsOur initial results indicate that RLT with Lu-PSMA is safe and seems to have low early side-effect profile. A relevant PSA decline was detected in 70 % of patients.

Outcome analyses for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are still limited, especially with regard to the impact of the Ki-67 index. Using a single-center analysis, we aimed to establish predictors of survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 74 patients who had metastatic GEP NET and underwent PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate (mean activity of 7.9 GBq per cycle, aimed at 4 treatment cycles at standard intervals of 3 mo). Patients (33 with pancreatic NET and 41 with nonpancreatic GEP NET) had unresectable metastatic disease graded as G1 or G2 (G1/G2) and documented morphologic or clinical progression within less than 12 mo or uncontrolled disease under somatostatin analog treatment. Responses were evaluated according to modified Southwest Oncology Group criteria. Potential predictors of survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curve method (log-rank test) and multivariate analysis (P , 0.05). Results: The response rates were 36.5% partial response, 17.6% minor response, 35.1% stable disease, and 10.8% progressive disease for the entire cohort; 54.5% partial response, 18.2% minor response, 18.2% stable disease, and 9.1% progressive disease for pancreatic NET; and 22.0% partial response, 17.1% minor response, 48.8% stable disease, and 12.2% progressive disease for nonpancreatic GEP NET. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 26 mo (95% confidence interval, 18.3-33.7) and 55 mo (95% confidence interval, 48.8-61.2), respectively. Besides the Ki-67 index, a Karnofsky performance score of less than or equal to 70%, a hepatic tumor burden of greater than or equal to 25%, and a baseline plasma level of neuron-specific enolase of greater than 15 ng/mL independently predicted shorter overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.1-3.1). Patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 10% still had median progression-free survival and overall survival of 19 and 34 mo, respectively. Conclusion:The results of this study demonstrated the favorable response and long-term outcome of patients with G1/G2 GEP NET after PRRT. Independent predictors of survival were the Ki-67 index, the patient's performance status (Karnofsky performance scale score), the tumor burden, and the baseline neuron-specific enolase level. Even patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 10% seemed to benefit from PRRT, with a good response and a notable long-term outcome. We present the first evidence, to our knowledge, that even in patients with metastatic disease the distinction between G1 and G2-in particular, between G1 (Ki-67 index of 1%-2%) and low-range G2 (Ki-67 index of 3%-10%)-provides prognostic stratification. Pept ide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a highly efficient modality for the systemic treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET) (1-4). The compound [ 177 Lu-DOTA 0 ,Tyr 3 ]octreotate ( 177 Lu-octreotate) is frequently used for this purpose. Outstanding response and survival data are ava...

Myelosuppression may be the dose-limiting toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and reversibility of long-term hematotoxicity in a large cohort of patient undergoing PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. The impact of potential risk factors, including initial cytopenia, advanced bone metastatic disease, previous chemotherapy, and cumulative administered activity, and the protective effects of splenectomy were of particular interest. Methods: A total of 632 PRRT courses were performed in 203 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. A mean activity of 7.9 GBq of 177 Lu-octreotate was administered per treatment cycle, with a goal of 4 courses at standard intervals of 3 mo. Hematologic parameters were determined before each treatment course, at 2-to 4-wk intervals between the courses, 8-12 wk after the last course of PRRT, and at 3-month intervals for further follow-up. Toxicity was recorded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Results: Myelodysplastic syndrome as a delayed adverse event was documented in 3 patients (1.4%). Relevant but reversible hematotoxicity (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 23 patients (11.3%) and 29 administrations (4.6%), with leukopenia in 2.7% and thrombocytopenia in 1.7%. The mean time to blood count recovery was 12 mo after the termination of PRRT (range, 3-22 mo). The only preexisting factor that contributed to hematotoxicity was initial cytopenia (P , 0.001). A high level of cumulative administered activity (.29.6 GBq) was associated with relevant leukopenia (P , 0.001). None of the patients with a history of splenectomy developed grade 3 or 4 hematotoxicity, and splenectomy was inversely associated with the incidence and degree of leukopenia (P 5 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (P 5 0.03) Conclusion: PRRT-induced myelosuppression is almost invariably reversible and rarely requires clinical measures. Administered activity and initial cytopenia are the only factors contributing to myelosuppression, whereas splenectomy may exert a protective effect. Pept ide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is a highly effective systemic treatment in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (1-9). Bone marrow suppression is regarded as one of the most serious side effects after PRRT (10-13). Because of the lower energy and the shorter tissue penetration of the emitted b particles, treatment with 177 Lu-labeled peptides may result in a lower level of overall toxicity than PRRT with 90 Y-labeled peptides (14). However, there are only limited data regarding hematotoxicity after PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate and contributing risk factors (2,15,16).The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and reversibility of myelosuppression in a large cohort of patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs treated with 177 Lu-octreotate. The impact of potential risk f...

SPECT/CT significantly improved the specificity and positive predictive value of bone scintigraphy in cancer patients. In breast cancer patients, we found a slight increase in sensitivity. SPECT/CT had a significant effect on clinical management because of correct downstaging and upstaging, better definition of the extent of metastases, and a reduction in further diagnostic procedures.