No abstract

BackgroundPersistent or recurrent lumbosacral pain is a common symptom after spinal surgery. Several interventions have been introduced for failed back surgery syndrome; however, their clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are insufficient. Sympathetic ganglion block has been selected for pain associated with the sympathetic nervous system. In this study, we compared pain and quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome who responded and did not respond to lumbar sympathetic ganglion block.MethodsWe included 84 patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome who had lumbosacral pain and underwent lumbar sympathetic ganglion block between January 2020 and April 2021. The patients’ data were retrospectively analyzed; clinical outcomes were assessed before (T0), 1 week after (T1), and 4 weeks after (T4) lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Based on the pain difference from T0 to T1, we categorized patients into two groups: patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction (responder group) and patients with < 50% pain reduction (non-responder group). Demographic, clinical, surgical, and fluoroscopic data were evaluated and compared. The primary outcome was pain scores and the EuroQol-5D score from T0 to T4.ResultsAmong the 84 patients analyzed, 41 (48.8%) experienced ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block significantly improved pain at T1 and T4 compared to T0 in both groups. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block improved the EuroQol-5D score at T1 compared to T0 in the responder group. The responder group had a significant decrease in pain at T1 from T0 and T4 from T0 and a significant decrease in the EuroQol-5D score at T1 from T0 compared with the non-responder group. Coldness of the leg over time did not differ between the groups. No serious adverse events occurred in either of the groups.ConclusionLumbar sympathetic ganglion block may improve pain at 1 and 4 weeks in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week showed simultaneous improvement in quality of life and pain reduction at 4 weeks.Clinical trial registrationhttps://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do, identifier KCT0007236.

No abstract

Background Tracheal intubation is closely associated with increases in intraocular pressure (IOP); however, the effects of double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation on IOP have not been validated. Systemic hypertension (HTN) is another factor that may increase IOP. In this study, we observed differences in IOP increases between DLT and singlelumen tube (SLT) intubation, and evaluated the influence of underlying HTN during rapid sequence induction. Methods Sixty-eight patients were allocated into one of the following group: SLT/without HTN (n = 17), SLT/HTN (n = 17), DLT/without HTN (n = 17), and DLT/HTN (n = 17). An SLT was inserted for orthopedic or gynecological surgery, and a DLT was inserted for lung surgery after rapid sequence induction using succinylcholine. IOP was measured before anesthetic induction and until 10 min after intubation using a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen AVIA ® ). Results In the DLT/without HTN and DLT/HTN groups, the maximum increases in IOPs after tracheal intubation were 7.9 and 12.2 mmHg, respectively, compared to baseline. In the SLT/without HTN and SLT/HTN groups, the maximum increases were 5.0 and 4.9 mmHg, respectively, compared to baseline. In comparisons between patients with and without underlying HTN, the values of IOPs were comparable. Conclusions Tracheal intubation with a DLT is associated with more increases in IOPs than with an SLT in rapid sequence induction. Well-controlled underlying hypertension did not increase IOP during tracheal intubation.