Background COVID-19 is a novel and highly virulent virus, which caused a rapid and massive onset of clinical trials in a short period of time.With the aim to obtain suggestions in the guidance on performing public health emergency clinical trials, and control this virus in China and other countries and for the prevention of the onset of other infectious viruses in the future. Methods COVID-19, SARS, MERS and Ebola clinical trials registered in the Chinese clinical trial registry and clinical trials.gov were collected and analyzed and intervention protocols were descriptively analyzed, focusing on the analysis and comparison of the drug used. The search period ended on February 24, 2020. Results The number of the registered COVID-19 clinical trials was 295. Among 203 intervention trials, 78.3% (159) were drug clinical trials. The 159 COVID-19 trials were designed and analyzed with the highest proportion of random, open control study [66.0% (105)], and blind randomized trials [13.8% (22)]. The drug mostly used was Lopinavir/Ritonavir (15.1%). The sample size median 100,IQR(interquartile range) 140. The number of the registered SARS was 6, MERS 15, and Ebola 97. Among 3 MERS and 19 Ebola drug intervention clinical trials, MERS and Ebola were randomized, blind, and placebo-controlled drug clinical trials accounting for 100% (3) and 31.6% (6), respectively, while SARS were vaccine trials, without drug intervention clinical trials registered. Conclusions Some of the COVID-19 clinical trials and drug selection performed are somewhat disordered, requiring greater attention to the needs, science assumptions, ethics and quality management of the clinical research. Thus, during the epidemic period, the country should deliver guidance on how to perform appropriate emergency clinical trials, design a scientifically based clinical trial program and focus on researching drugs or vaccines that have great potential.

No abstract

SummaryBackgroundAvailable incidence data for invasive salmonella disease in sub-Saharan Africa are scarce. Standardised, multicountry data are required to better understand the nature and burden of disease in Africa. We aimed to measure the adjusted incidence estimates of typhoid fever and invasive non-typhoidal salmonella (iNTS) disease in sub-Saharan Africa, and the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the causative agents.MethodsWe established a systematic, standardised surveillance of blood culture-based febrile illness in 13 African sentinel sites with previous reports of typhoid fever: Burkina Faso (two sites), Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Madagascar (two sites), Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, and Tanzania (two sites). We used census data and health-care records to define study catchment areas and populations. Eligible participants were either inpatients or outpatients who resided within the catchment area and presented with tympanic (≥38·0°C) or axillary temperature (≥37·5°C). Inpatients with a reported history of fever for 72 h or longer were excluded. We also implemented a health-care utilisation survey in a sample of households randomly selected from each study area to investigate health-seeking behaviour in cases of self-reported fever lasting less than 3 days. Typhoid fever and iNTS disease incidences were corrected for health-care-seeking behaviour and recruitment.FindingsBetween March 1, 2010, and Jan 31, 2014, 135 Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (S Typhi) and 94 iNTS isolates were cultured from the blood of 13 431 febrile patients. Salmonella spp accounted for 33% or more of all bacterial pathogens at nine sites. The adjusted incidence rate (AIR) of S Typhi per 100 000 person-years of observation ranged from 0 (95% CI 0–0) in Sudan to 383 (274–535) at one site in Burkina Faso; the AIR of iNTS ranged from 0 in Sudan, Ethiopia, Madagascar (Isotry site), and South Africa to 237 (178–316) at the second site in Burkina Faso. The AIR of iNTS and typhoid fever in individuals younger than 15 years old was typically higher than in those aged 15 years or older. Multidrug-resistant S Typhi was isolated in Ghana, Kenya, and Tanzania (both sites combined), and multidrug-resistant iNTS was isolated in Burkina Faso (both sites combined), Ghana, Kenya, and Guinea-Bissau.InterpretationTyphoid fever and iNTS disease are major causes of invasive bacterial febrile illness in the sampled locations, most commonly affecting children in both low and high population density settings. The development of iNTS vaccines and the introduction of S Typhi conjugate vaccines should be considered for high-incidence settings, such as those identified in this study.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Common HCoVs may have annual peaks of circulation in winter months in the US, and individual HCoVs may show variable circulation from year to year. Different HCoV species may be detected more frequently in different age groups. Further years of data are needed to better understand patterns of activity for HCoVs.