Schizophrenia is clinically and neuropsychologically characterized by severe cognitive and functional impairment suggesting the presence of a neurodegenerative process in the brains of affected individuals. A variety of neuroanatomical changes have been described such as loss and disorientation of neurons in grey and white matter and cortical atrophy. However, the neuropathological basis for schizophrenia is still unclear. In the present study we monitored the density of GFAP-positive astrocytes in brains of 33 schizophrenic patients and 26 healthy controls. Both grey matter (entorhinal cortex and subiculum) and white matter (premotor cortex, subventricular zone of the third ventricle and next to inferior horn) structures were measured bilaterally. The overall finding was that there is no evidence for increased astrogliosis in brains of schizophrenic patients vs healthy controls. Therefore, degeneration is unlikely to be the main neuropathological mechanism in schizophrenic brains.
The Clozapine Resource Centre in British Columbia is a centralized information source for all physicians wishing to prescribe clozapine and also performs back-up hematological and compliance monitoring. Laboratories fax weekly hematology results to physicians and to the center. The center enters results in a national database and compiles twice-weekly noncompliance reports; physicians are notified of abnormal results, and caregivers of noncompliance. The centralized system obviates the practice in some jurisdictions of hiring case coordinators to oversee these procedures and may reduce physician reluctance to prescribe clozapine. It improves coordination among monitoring and treatment parties and ensures better continuity of care.
The assessment of outcomes after treatment with antipsychotic medication is fundamental to clinical care and research. The Routine Assessment of Patient Progress (RAPP) is a reliable multidimensional scale that employs nurses' ratings of symptoms and functioning in psychiatric inpatients. The present study sought to extend validity evidence for the RAPP by examining its ability to reflect changes associated with treatment by antipsychotic medications. The use of a different sample in this study also provided the opportunity to replicate earlier validity data collected on the original set of patients. Ninety-seven separate trials were conducted, involving 65 consecutive admissions to a unit that specializes in the assessment and treatment of patients with long standing severe psychiatric disorders. The RAPP, along with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and global measures of severity, were administered at baseline and at the end of each trial. Both factor scores and clinically-derived subscales were analysed for sensitivity to change. Patients were globally rated as improved, unchanged or worsened at the end of the medication trial. Results indicated that the RAPP factor, clinical scale and total scores compared favourably to other outcome measures in patients rated as improved or worse. In patients rated as unchanged, RAPP scores displayed significantly less change than did the PANSS scores. These findings support the validity of the RAPP as an outcome measure in treatment trials.
Objective To study the clinical response to clozapine in patients with refractory schizophrenia. Method Open trial of clozapine in 61 consecutively-treated patients. Results Following clozapine, the level of function of patients was improved relative to admission (p = 0.0001) and to the highest level in the previous year (p = 0.0001). Severity of illness was decreased (p = 0.0001). Overall, 31% of the patients were classified as responders to clozapine and the responders were all identified by 32 weeks of treatment. Poor functioning in the previous year was associated with less favourable response. At a mean interval of 26 months following discharge, 72% of the patients were continuing clozapine treatment. Conclusions This open trial of patients who were treated consecutively indicates a comparable degree of response to clozapine as observed in controlled clinical trials, and that level of functioning in the previous year was the best predictor of response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.