Background: Modified Broström-Gould (MBG) surgery is frequently used for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). However, conventional postoperative management (CPOM) due to prolonged immobilization may have adverse effects on tendons, ligaments, and joints, causing stiffness. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to determine outcomes among patients randomized to receive CPOM plus ultrasonography-guided triple injections of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) compared to patients who receive only CPOM after MBG surgery. Methods: The present study included 40 patients with symptomatic CLAI who were candidates for the MBG surgery. The patients were randomized into 2 groups of 20, the control and PRP groups. In the PRP group, patients were injected with 3 doses of LR-PRP solution using ultrasonographic guidance. In the first injection, 2 mL of LR-PRP was injected near the injury site, and in the second and third injections, 4 mL of LR-PRP was injected in the tibiotalar joint. All patients received a short leg splint for 2 weeks, followed by 4 weeks in a walking boot. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome measures were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and ankle total range of motion (total ROM). The assessment was performed at baseline and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: The mean VAS and AOFAS scores improved significantly in both groups 6 months after surgery ( P < .001). However, the PRP group did not significantly improve in VAS or AOFAS scores compared with the control group. No clinically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding the total ROM scores at month 3. Conclusion: The application of LR-PRP after MBG surgery did not show any superior clinical or functional improvement over CPOM. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective randomized trial.
Background: This study aimed to assess the use of 3D-printed models for preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with genu varum deformity. Method: This study included Sixteen patients with genu varum divided into two groups: the model group and the control group. Before and after the operation, all patients in both groups underwent a lower limb standing alignment radiograph to measure mMPTA (mechanical Medial Proximal Tibial Angle), mLDFA (mechanical Lateral Distal Femur Angle), CA (Convergence Angle), and mFTA (mechanical FemuroTibial Angle). For the model group, a 3D-printed model was prepared before the surgery, and open wedge HTO was performed using this model. PTS (posterior tibial slope) and TTA (tibial torsion angle) were also measured in the model group, before and after operation. The control group underwent surgery without using a 3D printed model. Following the operation, the angles and the size of the bone opening in the medial axis on the model that underwent surgery were examined, and the measurements were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and side of injury. This study found no significant differences in mMPTA, mLDFA, mFTA, and CA between the groups in the 2D image. However, all angles changed significantly in both groups postoperatively, except for mLDFA in the model group. The mean changes in mMPTA, mFTA, and mMLDFA did not significantly differ between the groups, except for CA (P = .012). In the 3D model, PTS increased significantly while TTA decreased. Comparing angles between the 2D image and 3D model showed statistically significant differences, except for mFTA. The size of bone opening along the medial axis did not differ significantly between real surgery and the 3D model. The cost of hospitalization, cost of anesthesia, operation time, and also number of fluoroscopies were significantly lower in the model group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Using a 3D model for preoperative planning improved the correction of genu varum deformity in HTO. It also reduced the operation time, hospitalization and anesthesia costs, and fluoroscopy usage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.