In head and neck cancer (HNC), couple-based interventions may be useful for facilitating treatment completion, patient rehabilitation, and improving both partners’ quality of life (QOL). With the goal of identifying targets for future interventions, we conducted a qualitative study to understand patient and spouse unmet needs and relationship challenges during curative radiotherapy for HNC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 6 HNC patients (83% male) and 6 spouses (83% female) within 6 months of completing treatment. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed using Grounded Theory Analysis. Patients and spouses identified several unmet needs including better preparation regarding the severity of physical side effects, a clearer timeline for recovery, and strategies for dealing with their own and each other’s emotional reactions. Caregiver unmet needs included balancing competing roles/responsibilities, making time for self-care, and finding effective strategies for encouraging patient self-care. Eighty-three percent of spouses and all patients reported increased conflict during treatment. Other relationship challenges included changes in intimacy and social/leisure activities. Findings suggest that couple-based interventions that emphasize the importance of managing physical and psychological symptoms through the regular practice of self-care routines may be beneficial for both patients and spouses. Likewise, programs that teach spouses ways to effectively motivate and encourage patient self-care may help to minimize conflict and help couples navigate HNC treatment and recovery together as a team.
Colorectal cancer remains a leading source of cancer mortality worldwide. Initial response is often followed by emergent resistance that is poorly responsive to targeted therapies, reflecting currently undruggable cancer drivers such as KRAS and overall genomic complexity. Here, we report a novel approach to developing a personalized therapy for a patient with treatment-resistant metastatic KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer. An extensive genomic analysis of the tumor’s genomic landscape identified nine key drivers. A transgenic model that altered orthologs of these nine genes in the Drosophila hindgut was developed; a robotics-based screen using this platform identified trametinib plus zoledronate as a candidate treatment combination. Treating the patient led to a significant response: Target and nontarget lesions displayed a strong partial response and remained stable for 11 months. By addressing a disease’s genomic complexity, this personalized approach may provide an alternative treatment option for recalcitrant disease such as KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer.
Background:Pegloticase is a mammalian recombinant uricase coupled to monomethoxy polyethylene glycol that is approved in the US for treatment of patients with chronic refractory gout and causes profound reductions in serum urate. However, treatment with pegloticase is limited by the induction of anti-drug antibodies and loss of responsiveness in nearly half of treated patients.Objectives:The goal of this study was to determine whether co-therapy with azathioprine (AZA) would increase the frequency of chronic refractory gout patients who had persistent urate lowering from pegloticase therapy.Methods:This open label multicenter study enrolled subjects with chronic gout who failed to lower serum urate to <6 mg/dL despite medically indicated doses of urate lowering therapy (NCT02598596). Patients were screened for adequate levels of the AZA metabolizing enzyme thiopurine methyl transferase and then started on daily oral AZA 1.25 mg/kg for 1 week and then 2.5 mg/kg for the remainder of the trial. Blood levels of AZA metabolites 6-thioguanine and 6-methylmercaptopurine were measured biweekly. After receiving 2 weeks of AZA, patients were started on pegloticase (8 mg IV) and were treated biweekly for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the persistent lowering of serum urate to <6 mg/dL at the last three consecutive study visits. Patients who had an increase in serum urate to >6 mg/dL while on therapy did not receive additional pegloticase. All patients received infusion prophylaxis with hydrocortisone as well as gout flare prophylaxis.Results:To date, 12 patients have been enrolled. All patients were male, 75% white and 25% African American. Mean age was 62.4 ± 14.7 years, the mean BMI was 31.1 ± 4.5 and the mean duration of gout was 13.8 ± 9.2 years. At baseline, all patients had visible tophi; 58.3% suffered from gout flares; 81.8% had hypertension; 45.5% had dyslipidemia and 9.0% had coronary artery disease. Of the 12 patients, 6 have completed the full course of treatment with persistent urate lowering and 2 remain on treatment also with persistent urate lowering (figure). 2 patients lost the urate lowering effect, both after 2 doses of pegloticase, and did not receive additional therapy. 1 patient experienced an infusion reaction during the first dose (1 infusion reaction in 90 infusions [1.1%] in the entire trial to date) and 1 subject had subjective symptoms of AZA intolerance with no laboratory abnormalities; these subjects discontinued the study and were not evaluable for the endpoint. No adverse events related to AZA were reported and gout flares were noted in 6 subjects (mean 1.5 flares/patient with flares).Conclusion:AZA can be used safely in subjects with chronic refractory gout and appears to increase the frequency of subjects experiencing long term lowering of serum urate.References:Disclosure of Interests: :Hope Rainey: None declared, Herbert S.B. Baraf Grant/research support from: Horizon; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer; Janssen; AbbVie, Consultant of: Horizon; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Merck; AbbVie, Speakers bureau: Horizon, Anthony Yeo Employee of: Horizon, Peter Lipsky Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics
6069 Background: Locally advanced Human Papillomavirus (HPV) + oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) has a significantly better response, locoregional control and survival compared to non HPVOPC. Standard-dose chemoradiotherapy (sdCRT) results in significant side effects, leading to acute and life-threatening late morbidity. We studied whether reduced dose chemoradiation (rdCRT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) resulted in equivalent progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sdCRT + IC with decreased late morbidity. Methods: Patients with locally advanced OPC and < 20 pack years (py) smoking history were tested for p16 and then HPV by type-specific PCR. After 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) IC all HPV+/p16+ subjects underwent clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clinical responders were randomized to either sdCRT (70Gy) or rdCRT (56Gy) with weekly carboplatin (AUC 1.5) at a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was 2 year PFS; the secondary endpoint was 2 year overall survival (OS). Toxicity, late morbidity and swallowing were monitored. Results: 23 patients were enrolled and 20 randomized, 8 to sdCRT and 12 to rdCRT; 2 were HPV- and 1 refused further therapy after IC and were not randomized. Median age was 56.5 yrs (range 36-78); 30% were African-American, 10% were Hispanic, 5% were female; 16 were HPV 16+ and 4 were other high risk (HR) variants; 60% never smoked, 25% were < 10 py, and 15% were 10-20 py; 70% had high risk features: T4, N2c, or N3. Clinical response to TPF was 100%; 70% had a clinical complete response. As of February 1, patients have been followed for a median of 37.5 months (range 21.7 – 49.5). 2 year PFS/OS for sdCRT and rdCRT are 87.5% vs 83.3% (log-rank test p = 0.85), respectively. All 3 failures were local or regional and 2 of 3 occurred in non HPV16 HR variants. Conclusions: HPV+ OPC patients who received rdCRT after TPF IC had similar PFS/OS compared to those receiving sdCRT. These results uphold the potential clinical benefit of radiation dose reduction as a treatment option with comparable survival to the standard radiation dose. A Phase III trial comparing IC plus rdCRT to sdCRT alone or with IC is warranted in this population. Non-HPV16 HR variants may have a worse outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01706939.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.