Background: The purpose of this study was to compare between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in right colon cancer.Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, a prospective cohort study of 60 patients who diagnosed as operable right sided colon cancer was performed. The patients were classified into laparoscopic CME with CVL and open CME with CVL groups. Demographic variables, comorbidities, tumor location, intraoperative parameters, duration of hospital study, histopathological findings, postoperative complications and follow up data were compared between the two groups. Demographic variables included age and sex distribution. Intraoperative parameters included incision length, operative time and operative blood loss.Results: 60 patients were selected in this study. Both groups were the same in the age and sex distribution, potential comorbidities and tumor location. Patients in the Laparoscopic CME with CVL group had shorter incision lengths, longer operative times, less operative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, less number of retrieved lymph nodes , the same TNM (tumor nodes metastasis) classifications, similar histopathological findings and comparable incidence of postoperative complications.Conclusions: Laparoscopic CME with CVL procedure is a safe, valid and feasible surgical method for right colon cancers.
Background: Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and effective, and in some cases, superior to open surgery, for a range of benign illnesses. The short-term advantages include less gastrointestinal discomfort, decreased wound infection and surgical morbidity, quicker bowel function restoration, and a shorter duration of hospital stay.Aim of the work & Methodology: evaluate our practice in laparoscopic colectomy by studied 20 patients with benign colorectal disorders admitted to our university hospital between Dec. 2015 and Dec. 2020. Inclusion criteria: 1. Age ranging from 15 to 70 years. 2. Patients with benign colorectal diseases, e.g., diverticular diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, colonic polyps, rectal prolapse, etc. Exclusion criteria; malignant colorectal tumors and relative contraindication for laparoscopy. We were using classical laparoscopic techniques. Patients were discharged from the hospital when they could tolerate a regular diet. They were followed up at least six months, starting on the 30th postoperative day on a regular visit every two weeks—the data recorded including the intraoperative events and the difficulties and postoperative follow-up.Results: Technical difficulties are more remarkable for benign conditions than for cancer, especially for patients with inflammatory bowels, such as diverticular disease or inflammatory bowel disease, which frequently involve adjacent structures, peri-colic fibrosis, and lost planes. Surgeons should choose their patients before beginning laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery provides numerous advantages over open surgery, including minor discomfort, a shorter hospital stay, reduced morbidity, and a faster postoperative recovery. Our study cannot be utilized in a comparison study since it only evaluates our practice, and the findings may not be generalizable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.