Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 causes more severe symptoms in most chronic diseases, and rheumatic disease is no exception. This study aims to investigate whether there is an association between the use of immunomodulatory medications, including conventional disease-modifying agents (csDMARDs), glucocorticoids, and biologic DMARDs, and outcomes such as hospitalization and lung involvement in patients with rheumatic disease with COVID-19. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study on 177 COVID-19 cases with rheumatologic diseases using immunomodulatory drugs as their regular treatment. All patients were evaluated regarding their initial chest computed tomography (CT) scan, COVID-19 symptoms, and comorbidities. We ran predictive models to find variables associated with chest CT-scan involvement and hospitalization status. Results: CT findings showed lung involvement in 87 patients with chest CT-scan severity score (C-ss) of less than 8 in 59 (33%) and more than 8 in 28 (16%) of our patients. Of all patients, 76 (43%) were hospitalized. Hospitalized patients were significantly older and had more comorbidities (P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, older age [odds ratio (OR) 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-3.08] and comorbidity (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.06-3.66) were significantly associated with higher odds of hospitalization (P = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-2.01), pulmonary diseases (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.32), and treatment with csDMARDs (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.37-1.93) were associated with higher C-ss (P = 0.039). Conclusions: This study found that advanced age and comorbidities, similar to the general population, are risk factors for hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 with rheumatic disorders. Administration of csDMARDs, older age, and pulmonary disorders were linked to increased risk of COVID-19 pneumonia in these individuals.

Background In late 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which is responsible for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), was identified as the new pathogen to lead pneumonia in Wuhan, China, which has spread all over the world and developed into a pandemic. Despite the over 1 year of pandemic, due to the lack of an effective treatment plan, the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 remains high. Efforts are underway to find the optimal management for this viral disease. Main body SARS-CoV-2 could simultaneously affect multiple organs with variable degrees of severity, from mild to critical disease. Overproduction of pro-inflammatory mediators, exacerbated cellular and humoral immune responses, and coagulopathy such as Pulmonary Intravascular Coagulopathy (PIC) contributes to cell injuries. Considering the pathophysiology of the disease and multiple microthrombi developments in COVID-19, thrombolytic medications seem to play a role in the management of the disease. Beyond the anticoagulation, the exact role of thrombolytic medications in the management of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is not explicit. This review focuses on current progress in underlying mechanisms of COVID-19-associated pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy, the historical use of thrombolytic drugs in the management of ARDS, and pharmacotherapy considerations of thrombolytic therapy, their possible benefits, and pitfalls in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Conclusions Inhaled or intravenous administration of thrombolytics appears to be a salvage therapy for severe ARDS associated with COVID-19 by prompt attenuation of lung injury. Considering the pathogenesis of COVID-19-related ARDS and mechanism of action of thrombolytic agents, thrombolytics appear attractive options in stable patients without contraindications.

BackgroundCompared to the healthy population, the psychological impact of rheumatoid arthritis(RA) on patients' lives could dramatically lower their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Our goal is to analyze OHRQoL in RA patients and look into the role of disease activity, dental health index, and Temporomandibular disorders score in maintaining their oral health.MethodsIn a cross-sectional comparative study, we compared a random sample of 40 RA patients with 40 age- and gender-matched healthy controls in terms of oral health and OHRQoL. Temporomandibular disorders (TMD), number of decayed, filled, or missing teeth (DMFT), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) were among the oral health factors studied (OHIP-14). This study also looked at the link between the RA disease activity score (DAS28) and oral health factors.ResultsRA patients had a significantly higher mean than healthy controls in total oral function, total psychosocial impact, OHIP-14 sum score, OHIP-14 extent score, TMD score and the number of missed teeth (Mann-Whitney U test, P-value<0.05). After adjustment for DMFT, only the oral function score of OHIP-14 had a significant correlation with disease activity (Mann-Whitney U test, P-value<0.05). The TMD sum score significantly correlated with disease activity regardless of adjustment for DMFT (Spearman's Correlation test, P-value<0.05 for both). The number of decayed teeth and missed teeth showed a positive correlation with increased disease activity (Coefficient =0.239 and 0.245, P-value<0.05 for both).ConclusionsPatients with RA are less satisfied with their oral health than healthy controls. In RA patients, the number of missing teeth and temporomandibular disorders was substantially greater, and the number of missing teeth and temporomandibular diseases increased significantly with increased disease activity. Although OHRQoL was inversely connected with RA activity, after correcting for decaying, missing, and filled teeth, only the oral function score of OHIP-14 exhibited a slight connection to DAS28.