The choice of a first-line therapy for lung cancer is a crucial decision that can impact the survival as well as the quality of life of a patient. Inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib have previously been used to treat non-small cell lung cancer harboring favorable EGFR mutations. Although afatinib has greater efficacy than other EGFR inhibitors, adverse events related to its use can result in the discontinuation of the therapy. In this study, we compared the therapeutic efficacy in lung cancer patients of a regimen of 40 mg/day of afatinib with that of a lower dose regimen of <40 mg/day resulting either from a lower starting dose of 30 mg/day or dose adjustment. Seventy-nine patients were treated with 40 mg/day and 67 received de-escalated doses of <40 mg/day. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics of the two groups except that the proportion of patients with a body weight of 50 kg or more was greater in the 40 mg/day group. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the average time to treatment failure (TTF), the rates at which the administration of a second-line therapy was necessary, or the frequency and severity of adverse events. Overall, these results suggest that it is possible to calibrate the dosage of afatinib to suit individual patient parameters such as low body weight, and that such calibration can be advised based on the given patient’s individual experience of the drug.

Background Single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival outcomes compared to chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but treatment efficacy widely varies. The combination of ICIs with chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy over chemotherapy alone; however, whether this strategy is superior to single agent ICIs for the treatment of advanced NSCLC remains unknown. Methods The records of 109 patients with advanced NSCLC who were administered at least one cycle of ICIs were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of a chemotherapy treatment combination. Efficacy and survival outcomes were analyzed. Result Sixty‐nine (58.0%) patients received single agent ICIs (ICI group) and 50 (42.0%) received ICIs and chemotherapy (ICC group). The median (3.2 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.025) and one‐year (34.5 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.026) progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were significantly better in the ICC than in the ICI group. The superior efficacy of ICC remained in the propensity score matched pairs (median PFS 3.2 vs. 2.6 months, P = 0.032; 1‐year PFS 35.2 vs. 7.6%; P = 0.035). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22–0.62; P < 0.001) and the ICC group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.94; P = 0.028) were predictive of PFS. Subgroup‐to‐chemotherapy interaction revealed improved risk reduction for adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutation. Conclusion Combing chemotherapy with ICIs improved treatment efficacy over ICIs alone. The additional efficacy of chemotherapy may differ between histological subtypes and EGFR mutation status.

In patients with early ARDS, pentastarch resuscitation significantly improved their hemodynamics and cardiac output without worsening pulmonary edema and pulmonary mechanics. It even attenuated pulmonary vascular permeability.

The impact of an initial skeletal-related event (SRE) and denosumab adjuvant treatment on the survival outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastasis remains unclear. This retrospective study included 400 metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Among 190 bone metastasis patients, 61 had initial SREs and 73 received denosumab. We analyzed patient characteristics, SRE-free survival (SRE-FS), and overall survival (OS). In metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, bone metastasis was associated with a poorer OS (21.7 vs. 33.0 months; p < 0.001). Bone metastasis patients with initial SREs at diagnosis had an even shorter OS, compared with those without initial SRE (15.4 vs. 23.6 months; p = 0.026). Denosumab reduced SRE incidence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.94; p = 0.027) and was associated with improved OS (26.6 vs. 20.1 months; p = 0.015). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that denosumab treatment was correlated with a lower incidence of SRE (HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.37–0.98); p = 0.042) and better OS (HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.41–0.88); p = 0.008). In subgroup analyses, denosumab prolonged SRE-FS (HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.19–0.79); p = 0.009) in patients without initial SREs and was related to a better OS (25.3 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.016) in patients with initial or pre-existing SREs. Osteonecrosis of the jaw was diagnosed in two patients (2.74%) receiving denosumab. Our study confirmed the association between initial SREs and a worse outcome and provided novel evidence of the survival benefit of denosumab for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with bone metastasis.

Purpose Cutaneous toxicities are common adverse effects following epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) therapy. Zinc deficiency causes diverse diseases, including skin toxicities. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the role of zinc deficiency in patients with EGFR‐TKI‐induced skin toxicities. Experimental Design This retrospective study enrolled 269 patients with diverse skin disorders who visited our hospital between January 2016 and December 2017. The skin toxicity severities and plasma zinc levels of 101 EGFR‐TKI‐treated cancer patients were analysed and compared with those of 43 non‐EGFR‐TKI‐treated cancer patients and 125 patients without cancer but presenting cutaneous manifestations. Additionally, the role of zinc in erlotinib‐induced skin eruptions was established in a 14‐day‐murine model. Clinical features were further evaluated following systemic zinc supplementation in EGFR‐TKI‐treated cancer patients. Results EGFR‐TKI‐treated patients demonstrated severe cutaneous manifestations and a significant decrease in plasma zinc levels than those of the control groups. The serum zinc level and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 grading of EGFR‐TKI‐induced skin toxicities showed a significant negative correlation (r = −0.29; p < 0.0001). Moreover, erlotinib treatment decreased the plasma zinc levels and induced periorificial dermatitis in rats confirming zinc deficiency following EGFR‐TKI treatment. Zinc supplementation to the EGFR‐TKI‐treated cancer patients showed a significant decrease in the CTCEA grading (p < 0.0005 for mucositis and p < 0.0.0001 for all other cases) after 8 weeks. Conclusions Skin impairment following EGFR‐TKI therapy could be ameliorated through zinc supplementation. Thus, zinc supplementation should be considered for cancer patients undergoing EGFR‐TKI therapy.