Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease to the addition of once-weekly subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30 mg to 50 mg) or matching placebo to standard care. We hypothesized that albiglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome of first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. If noninferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio of less than 1.30, closed-testing for superiority was prespecified. Findings: Overall, 9463 participants were followed for a median of 1.6 years. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 of 4731 patients (7.1%; 4.6 events per 100 person-years) in the albiglutide group and in 428 of 4732 patients (9.0%; 5.9 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI ], 0.68 to 0.90), indicating that albiglutide, was superior to placebo (P<0.0001 for noninferiority, P=0.0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (albiglutide 10 patients and placebo 7 patients), pancreatic cancer (6 and 5), medullary thyroid carcinoma (0 and 0), and other serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Harmony Outcomes ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02465515.) noninferiority; P = 0.06 for superiority). There seems to be variation in the results of existing trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists, which if correct, might reflect drug structure or duration of action, patients studied, duration of follow-up or other factors.
Growth hormone administered to men with adult-onset growth hormone deficiency at a dose adjusted according to serum IGF-1 levels increases bone density and stimulates bone turnover, decreases body fat and increases lean mass, and is associated with a low incidence of side effects.
Adult GH deficiency (AGHD) is characterized by an altered body composition, an atherogenic lipid profile, decreased exercise capacity, and diminished quality of life. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in 166 subjects with AGHD to assess the effects of GH on these outcomes. GH was initiated at 0.0125 mg/kg.d, increased to 0.025 mg/kg.d as tolerated, or decreased to 0.00625 mg/kg.d for 12 months. Primary measures of efficacy included body composition, strength and endurance, and quality of life. Additional parameters included serum IGF-I concentrations, serum lipids, and bone mineral density. After 12 months, 79% of subjects remained on GH 0.0125 mg/kg.d, whereas 21% received 0.00625 mg/kg.d. GH-treated men and women demonstrated significant decreases in total body and trunk fat and increases in lean body mass over baseline. In GH-treated men, mean IGF-I SD scores exceeded age-adjusted normal ranges, whereas similar doses produced a smaller response in women. GH treatment was associated with significant improvements in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (P < 0.05 for all). No significant treatment effects were observed in strength and endurance, quality of life, or bone mineral density. GH treatment was generally well tolerated. Subjects with AGHD should receive individualized GH therapy to maintain IGF-I between the mean value and +2 SD and improve body composition and cardiovascular risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.