Objectives In this study we investigated the correlation between depression and frailty in older adults. Additionally, correlations among study designs (prospective vs. cross‐sectional), regions, depression indices, frailty indices, covariance corrections, and sexes were explored to support the analysis. Methods A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis were conducted. A total of 84,351 older adults, all 65 years of age or older, were analyzed. Both authors independently extracted and examined retrieved articles. Searched keywords included “depression” or “depressive”; “frailty” or “frail”; and “older people,” “elderly,” “geriatric,” or “senior.” Articles published between January 2000 and December 2016 were searched. A literature quality assessment was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Systematic literature searches were conducted on the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases, and collected studies were analyzed using a random effects model. Results Fourteen studies on people 65 years of age or older were collected, and a correlation analysis was conducted for depression and frailty. According to the meta‐analysis, the risk for frailty due to depression was nonsignificant among the subgroups for study design (p for heterogeneity = .149), region (p = .429), depression criteria (p = .934), covariate adjustment (p = .702), and frailty criteria (p = .661). Notably, the risk for frailty due to depression was significantly higher in men than in women (pooled odds ratios for men and women: 4.76 and 2.25, respectively; Qbetween χ2 = 9.93, p = .002). Conclusion Older adults with depression are more prone to frailty than are those without depression. Regardless of study design, region, depression index, frailty index, and covariance corrections, no significant differences were observed in the results of studies on depression and frailty in older adults. The only factor that had a significant influence was sex; older men with depression were at a higher risk for frailty than were older women with depression. Clinical Relevance Depression and frailty are pertinent health concerns related to geriatric syndromes. Because older adults with depression have a high risk for frailty, nursing personnel should use a depression index as early as possible to screen for depression and further reduce the occurrence of frailty in older adults. Furthermore, based on the aforementioned differences between the sexes, special attention should be paid to older men with depression to reduce their risk for frailty.

Background Scholars have noted that frailty easily leads to functional deterioration and proneness to complications. Little literature addresses the stages of frailty in middle‐aged and older adults and the effects of frailty on overall health. Aims This study explores the effect of different stages of frailty on the prospective health (falls, bone fractures, disability, dementia, hospitalization, and death) of middle‐aged and older adults. In addition, different frailty indicators were compared to determine their usefulness in predicting future adverse health outcomes. Methods The authors of this study separately reviewed and extracted data from the literature obtained while searching the following keywords: “frailty” OR “frail” and “fall” OR “disability” OR “fracture” OR “hospitalization” OR “mortality” OR “cognitive function” “dementia” OR “Alzheimer’s disease” and “middle‐aged people” OR “older people” OR “elderly” OR “geriatric” OR “senior.” The literature search was performed from January 2001 to November 2019 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Specifically, we performed a systematic literature search in multiple databases—Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library—and analyzed all obtained literature results using a random‐effects model. Results We collected a total of 29 prospective studies for the systematic literature review and meta‐analysis. The main results indicated that the frail groups had significantly higher risks of adverse health effects (falls, bone fractures, disability, dementia, hospitalization, and death) than the robust or prefrail groups. Linking Evidence to Action Frailty is a crucial healthcare topic among geriatric syndromes. Considering that older adults with frailty are most likely to develop severe adverse health outcomes, professional nursing personnel should assess frailty among middle‐aged and older adults and offer relevant care strategies to reduce the adverse effects of frailty in this population.

Rationale: Heterotopic ossification (HO), which is defined as the formation of new bone in tissues that do not normally ossify, is an infrequent yet debilitating complication of burns. Herein, we report three patients who suffered from elbow HO after burn injury due to a dust explosion event. This is a case report that includes the most cases involved in a single mass casualty incident in the presented literature. Patient concerns: Case 1: A 28-year-old man presented with second-to-third degree 88% total body surface area (TBSA) burns after the explosion event. He complained of decreased progressive bilateral elbow range of motion (ROM) for 1.5 months after the burn injury. Case 2: A 28-year-old woman presented with second-to-third degree 50% TBSA burns and complained of decreased progressive bilateral elbow ROM with intolerable pain on elbow extension for 1 month after the burn injury. Case 3: A 22-year-old man presented with second-to-third degree 90% TBSA burns and complained of significantly decreased left elbow ROM with intolerable pain 5 months after the burn injury. Diagnosis: The follow-up radiograph of the symptomatic elbow of these three patients revealed heterotopic ossification formation. Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography performed preoperatively showed that HO mainly affected the humeroulnar joint. Interventions: We treated all three patients with surgical elbow HO resection and ulnar nerve transposition, followed by immediate passive ROM exercise since postoperative day 1 and continuous physical therapy. Outcomes: In case 1, the documented ROM gain on the last follow-up (18.5 months after surgery) was 30° in the right elbow and 118° in the left elbow. In case 2, the follow-up time was 21 months and the documented ROM gain on the last follow-up was 120° in the right elbow and 90° in the left elbow. In case 3, the follow-up time was 20 months and the documented left elbow ROM gain on the last follow-up was 40°. Lessons: We discuss our experience of treating postburn HO and review the recent literature. The postburn HO treatment results of early surgical excision combined with immediate postoperative physical therapy were satisfactory.