Objective There is limited information from population‐based cancer registries regarding prognostic features of bilateral primary breast cancer (BPBC). Methods Female patients diagnosed with BPBC between 2004 and 2014 were randomly divided into training (n = 7740) and validation (n = 2579) cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. We proposed five various models. Multivariate Cox hazard regression and competing risk analysis were to explore prognosis factors in training cohort. Competing risk nomograms were constructed to combine significant prognostic factors to predict the 3‐year and the 5‐year survival of patients with BPBC. At last, in the validation cohort, the new score performance was evaluated with respect to the area under curve, concordance index, net reclassification index and calibration curve. Results We found out that age, interval time, lymph nodes invasion, tumor size, tumor grade and estrogen receptor status were independent prognostic factors in both multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis and competing risk analysis. Concordance index in the model of the worse characteristics was 0.816 (95% CI: 0.791‐0.840), of the bilateral tumors was 0.819 (95% CI: 0.793‐0.844), of the worse tumor was 0.807 (0.782‐0.832), of the first tumor was 0.744 (0.728‐0.763) and of the second tumor was 0.778 (0.762‐0.794). Net reclassification index of the 3‐year and the 5‐year between them was 2.7% and −1.0%. The calibration curves showed high concordance between the nomogram prediction and actual observation. Conclusion The prognosis of BPBC depended on bilateral tumors. The competing risk nomogram of the model of the worse characteristics may help clinicians predict survival simply and effectively. Metachronous bilateral breast cancer presented poorer survival than synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

No abstract

Background Recently, multiple studies have focused on cardiac toxicity induced by radiation, particularly in patients with breast carcinoma. However, in most circumstances, the radiation intensity is much higher for the heart in patients with esophageal carcinoma. This study aimed to investigate whether cardiac toxicity is related to radiation and distinguish the types of patients who are more susceptible to cardiac death. Methods We analyzed 8,210 esophageal cancer survivors who were involved in the US Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer program. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the disease characteristics in radiation therapy (RT) and non-RT groups. Cox hazard proportional regression and Kaplan-Meier method were applied to determine independent risk factors of cardiac death. Results The most important risk factors determining heart death were age (HR, 14.297; 95% CI: 9.174–22.283) and radiation (HR, 1.952; 95% CI: 1.684–2.263). The radiotherapy performed in the middle (HR, 1.872; 95% CI: 1.464–2.395) and lower thoracic segment of the esophagus (HR, 1.539; 95% CI: 1.464–1.772) was associated with an increased risk of cardiogenic death, which occurred since the first year after diagnosis. Compared with RT in postoperative group (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37–0.62), patients in preoperative group had a significantly increased survival rate. Conclusions Cardiogenic death is closely related to RT in esophageal cancer patients. Age, radiation sequence and tumor sites are key factors influencing the cardiac death risk induced by radiotherapy. Early detection and prevention are necessary for the high-risk population.

Background: Pancreatic cancer frequently results in celiac artery invasion, resulting in an unresectable disease that generally has a median survival period of 6-11 months. Efforts to achieve curative resection of such tumors have been made by conducting distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) in some patients, but the long-term outcome data associated with this approach or its overall value remain to be clarified.Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the clinical efficacy of the DP-CAR treatment of unresectable tumors of the pancreatic body or tail (registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019129612). The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant retrospective studies pertaining to such treatment. Results: Overall, 12 retrospective cohort analyses incorporating 213 total DP-CAR cases and 911 DP cases were incorporated into the present meta-analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that relative to DP, DP-CAR was related to a longer operative duration [mean difference (MD) −73.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): −112.99 to −34.38, P=0.0002] and higher blood transfusion rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.87; P=0.03]. DP-CAR was also linked to increased rates of PV resection (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.39; P<0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.93, P=0.03). In contrast, R0 resection rates were higher in the DP group (OR 2.79, 95% CI: 1.90 to 4.09, P<0.001), and these patients also had a significantly improved prognosis (median survival time, 27.0 vs. 17.7 months; P<0.01) relative to the DP-CAR group.Conclusions: This analysis indicates that DP-CAR is not an effective means of improving R0 rates.However, available studies suggest that it is nonetheless a potentially valuable treatment option for pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis involvement, and it is associated with a reasonable median survival duration of 17.7 months.