No abstract

A double-negative feedback loop formed by the morning genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1)/LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and the evening gene TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1) contributes to regulation of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. A 24-h circadian cycle starts with the peak expression of CCA1 at dawn. Although CCA1 is targeted by multiple transcriptional repressors, including PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR9 (PRR9), PRR7, PRR5 and CCA1 HIKING EXPEDITION (CHE), activators of CCA1 remain elusive. Here we use mathematical modelling to infer a co-activator role for LIGHT-REGULATED WD1 (LWD1) in CCA1 expression. We show that the TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1-CYCLOIDEA-PCF20 (TCP20) and TCP22 proteins act as LWD-interacting transcriptional activators. The concomitant binding of LWD1 and TCP20/TCP22 to the TCP-binding site in the CCA1 promoter activates CCA1. Our study reveals activators of the morning gene CCA1 and provides an action mechanism that ensures elevated expression of CCA1 at dawn to sustain a robust clock.

The recognition of ubiquitylated substrates is an essential element of ubiquitin ⁄ 26S proteasome-mediated proteolysis (UPP), which is mediated directly by the proteasome subunit RPN10 and ⁄ or RPN13, or indirectly by ubiquitin receptors containing ubiquitin-like and ubiquitin-associated domains. By pull-down and mutagenesis assays, we detected cross-species divergence of the major recognition pathways. RPN10 plays a major role in direct recognition in Arabidopsis and yeast based on the strong affinity for the long and K48-linked ubiquitin chains. In contrast, both the RPN10 and RPN13 homologs play major roles in humans. For indirect recognition, the RAD23 and DSK2 homologs (except for the human DSK2 homolog) are major receptors. The human RAD23 homolog is targeted to the 26S proteasome by the RPN10 and RPN13 homologs. In comparison, Arabidopsis uses UIM1 and UIM3 of RPN10 to bind DSK2 and RAD23, respectively. Yeast uses UIM in RPN10 and LRR in RPN1. Overall, multiple proteasome subunits are responsible for the direct and ⁄ or indirect recognition of ubiquitylated substrates in yeast and humans. In contrast, a single proteasome subunit, RPN10, is critical for both the direct and indirect recognition pathways in Arabidopsis. In agreement with these results, the accumulation of ubiquitylated substrates and severe pleiotropic phenotypes of vegetative and reproductive growth are associated with the loss of RPN10 function in an Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutant. This implies that the targeting and proteolysis of the critical regulators involved are affected. These results support a cross-species mechanistic and functional divergence of the major recognition pathways for ubiquitylated substrates of UPP. Structured digital abstractl A list of the large number of protein-protein interactions described in this article is available via the MINT article ID MINT-7307429Abbreviations GST, glutathione S-transferase; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; PRU, Pleckstrin-like receptor of ubiquitin; RP, regulatory particle; UBA, ubiquitinassociated domain; UBL, ubiquitin-like domain; UIM, ubiquitin-interacting motif; UPP, ubiquitin ⁄ 26S proteasome-mediated proteolysis; Y2H, yeast two-hybrid analysis.

Ubiquitylated substrate recognition during ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated proteolysis (UPP) is mediated directly by the proteasome subunits RPN10 and RPN13 and indirectly by ubiquitin-like (UBL) and ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain-containing factors. To dissect the complexity and functional roles of UPP substrate recognition in Arabidopsis thaliana, potential UPP substrate receptors were characterized. RPN10 and members of the UBL-UBA-containing RAD23 and DSK2 families displayed strong affinities for Lys-48-linked ubiquitin chains (the major UPP signals), indicating that they are involved in ubiquitylated substrate recognition. Additionally, RPN10 uses distinct interfaces as primary proteasomal docking sites for RAD23s and DSK2s. Analyses of T-DNA insertion knockout or RNA interference knockdown mutants of potential UPP ubiquitin receptors, including RPN10, RPN13, RAD23a-d, DSK2a-b, DDI1, and NUB1, demonstrated that only the RPN10 mutant gave clear phenotypes. The null rpn10-2 showed decreased double-capped proteasomes, increased 20S core complexes, and pleiotropic vegetative and reproductive growth phenotypes. Surprisingly, the observed rpn10-2 phenotypes were rescued by a RPN10 variant defective in substrate recognition, indicating that the defectiveness of RPN10 in proteasome but not substrate recognition function is responsible for the null phenotypes. Our results suggest that redundant recognition pathways likely are used in Arabidopsis to target ubiquitylated substrates for proteasomal degradation and that their specific roles in vivo require further examination.

No abstract