Objective: This study investigated the long-term success rate of retropubic suburethral sling in the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and different bladder function.Methods: Surgical outcomes of women with SUI undergoing a retropubic suburethral sling procedure between October 1989 and November 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Bladder function was evaluated in every patient preoperatively using videourodynamic studies. Patients were classified as having stable bladder, detrusor overactivity (DO), or detrusor underactivity (DU). Baseline urodynamic parameters were analyzed and long-term therapeutic outcomes were compared among these three groups.Results: In all, 403 patients underwent sling procedure for SUI. Of these, 291 (72.2%) had a stable bladder, 78 (19.4%) had DO, and 34 (8.4%) had DU. Mean (AE SD) patient age was 60.2 AE 11.8 years, and the median follow-up was 97 months (interquartile range 24--325 months). Postoperatively, the overall continence rate was 83.4% (336/403). After surgery, 71 patients (17.6%) complained of dysuria, 14 (3.5%) complained of urgency incontinence, 25 (6.2%) had recurrent SUI requiring a secondary sling procedure, and urethrolysis was performed in 13 (3.2%). In the stable bladder, DO, and DU groups, the 5-year continence rates were 88.6%, 84.1%, and 79.4%, respectively (P = 0.59), whereas the 10-year continence rates were 83.8%, 72.9%, and 79.4%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that the longterm success rate was similar among the three groups (P = 0.39). Conclusions:The overall continence rate was 83.4% and the 10-year continence rate was satisfactory in all bladder function subgroups. Treatment outcomes were the same for women with SUI but different bladder function. K E Y W O R D Sbladder function, long-term outcome, suburethral sling
Repeat suburethral sling procedures for recurrent SUI are safe and effective. The position of the second sling at the proximal urethra resulted in a relatively higher continence rate relative to other sites.
PurposeTo investigate long-term therapeutic effects and patient adherence to a combination therapy of a 5α-reductase inhibitor and an α-blocker and to identify causes of withdrawal from medication in patients with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsBPH patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) receiving combination therapy with follow-ups for 1–12 years were retrospectively analyzed. Therapeutic effects were assessed at baseline and annually by measuring International Prostatic Symptoms Score, quality of life index, total prostate volume (TPV), maximal flow rate, voided volume, postvoid residual volume and prostate-specific antigen level. Causes of discontinued combination therapy were also investigated.ResultsA total of 625 patients, aged 40–97 years (mean, 73 years) were retrospectively analyzed. All measured parameters showed significant improvements after combination therapy. Three hundred sixty-nine patients (59%) discontinued combination therapy with a mean treatment duration of 2.2 years. The most common reasons for discontinued treatment were changing medication to monotherapy with α-blockers or antimuscarinics (124 patients, 19.8%), receiving surgical intervention (39 patients, 6.2%), and LUTS improvement (53 patients, 8.5%). Only 64 patients (10.2%) were loss to follow-up and 6 (1.0%) discontinued combined treatment due to adverse effects. Smaller TPV after short-term combination treatment caused withdrawal from combination therapy.ConclusionsBPH patients receiving long-term combination therapy showed significant improvement in all measured parameters. Changing medication, improved LUTS and choosing surgery are common reasons for discontinuing combination herapy. A smaller TPV after short-term combination treatment was among the factors that caused withdrawal from combination therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.