In the last decades the study of Sahara rock art has developed its own agenda within prehistoric research and taken off as an archaeological sub-discipline. Africa has gone from being seen as an empty continent to an autonomous source of culture, and the Sahara as a container of an immense cultural and artistic legacy whose scope researchers are only now starting to comprehend. This cultural and artistic legacy is the object of many studies aimed at understanding the specific contexts of art production. The characteristic style of Tètes Rondes is the one whose interpretation poses the most difficulties to researchers. For this reason it occupies an important part of this article. The lack of contextual information (material remains) that would help validate or refute hypotheses made by researchers and the importance of not settling for a 'superficial' reading of the images for the study of the art, are some of the aspects that will be examined. This article holds that to overcome some of these problems it is essential to use open-ended approaches that will allow initial premises not to be constrained from the offset by broader theoretical currents. Adapting the interpretative theories to the archaeological remains, and not the other way around, is fundamental to the improvement of our knowledge of the past.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.