The skeletal muscle L-type Ca2+ channel (CaV1.1) works primarily as a voltage sensor for skeletal muscle action potential (AP)-evoked Ca2+ release. CaV1.1 contains four distinct voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), yet the contribution of each VSD to AP-evoked Ca2+ release remains unknown. To investigate the role of VSDs in excitation–contraction coupling (ECC), we encoded cysteine substitutions on each S4 voltage-sensing segment of CaV1.1, expressed each construct via in vivo gene transfer electroporation, and used in cellulo AP fluorometry to track the movement of each CaV1.1 VSD in skeletal muscle fibers. We first provide electrical measurements of CaV1.1 voltage sensor charge movement in response to an AP waveform. Then we characterize the fluorescently labeled channels’ VSD fluorescence signal responses to an AP and compare them with the waveforms of the electrically measured charge movement, the optically measured free myoplasmic Ca2+, and the calculated rate of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum for an AP, the physiological signal for skeletal muscle fiber activation. A considerable fraction of the fluorescence signal for each VSD occurred after the time of peak Ca2+ release, and even more occurred after the earlier peak of electrically measured charge movement during an AP, and thus could not directly reflect activation of Ca2+ release or charge movement, respectively. However, a sizable fraction of the fluorometric signals for VSDs I, II, and IV, but not VSDIII, overlap the rising phase of charge moved, and even more for Ca2+ release, and thus could be involved in voltage sensor rearrangements or Ca2+ release activation.

In excitation–contraction coupling (ECC), when the skeletal muscle action potential (AP) propagates into the transverse tubules, it modifies the conformational state of the voltage-gated calcium channels (CaV1.1). CaV1.1 serves as the voltage sensor for activation of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR); however, many questions about this function persist. CaV1.1 α1 subunits contain four distinct homologous domains (I–IV). Each repeat includes six transmembranal helical segments; the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) is formed by S1–S4 segments, and the pore domain is formed by helices S5–S6. Because, in other voltage-gated channels, individual VSDs appear to be differentially involved in specific aspects of channel gating, here we thus hypothesized that not all the VSDs in CaV1.1 contribute equally to calcium-release activation. Yet, the voltage-sensor movements during an AP (the physiological stimulus for the muscle fiber) have not been previously measured in muscle. Reorientation of VSDs I–IV in CaV1.1 during an AP should generate a small but measurable electrical current. Still, neither the voltage-sensor charge movement during the AP nor the contribution of the individual VSDs to voltage-gated calcium release have been previously monitored. Here, we electrically monitor VSD movements using an AP voltage-clamp technique applied to muscle fibers. We introduce AP-fluorometry, a variant of the functional site-directed fluorescence, to track the movement of each VSD via a cysteine substitution on the extracellular region of S4 of each VSD and its labeling with a cysteine-reacting fluorescent probe, which served as an optical reporter of local rearrangements. Independent optical recordings of AP and calcium transients were performed to establish the temporal correlation between AP, AP-elicited charge movement, VSDs conformational changes, and calcium release flux. Our results support the hypothesis that not all VSDs in CaV1.1 contribute to ECC.

Ca2+ influx through high-voltage-activated calcium channels (HVACCs) controls diverse cellular functions. A critical feature enabling a singular signal, Ca2+ influx, to mediate disparate functions is diversity of HVACC pore-forming α1 and auxiliary CaVβ1–CaVβ4 subunits. Selective CaVα1 blockers have enabled deciphering their unique physiological roles. By contrast, the capacity to post-translationally inhibit HVACCs based on CaVβ isoform is non-existent. Conventional gene knockout/shRNA approaches do not adequately address this deficit owing to subunit reshuffling and partially overlapping functions of CaVβ isoforms. Here, we identify a nanobody (nb.E8) that selectively binds CaVβ1 SH3 domain and inhibits CaVβ1-associated HVACCs by reducing channel surface density, decreasing open probability, and speeding inactivation. Functionalizing nb.E8 with Nedd4L HECT domain yielded Chisel-1 which eliminated current through CaVβ1-reconstituted CaV1/CaV2 and native CaV1.1 channels in skeletal muscle, strongly suppressed depolarization-evoked Ca2+ influx and excitation-transcription coupling in hippocampal neurons, but was inert against CaVβ2-associated CaV1.2 in cardiomyocytes. The results introduce an original method for probing distinctive functions of ion channel auxiliary subunit isoforms, reveal additional dimensions of CaVβ1 signaling in neurons, and describe a genetically-encoded HVACC inhibitor with unique properties.

The Ca V 1.1 voltage-gated Ca 2+ channel carries L-type Ca 2+ current and is the voltage-sensor for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle. Significant breakthroughs in the EC coupling field have often been close on the heels of technological advancement. In particular, Ca V 1.1 was the first voltage-gated Ca 2+ channel to be cloned, the first ion channel to have its gating current measured and the first ion channel to have an effectively null animal model. Though these innovations have provided invaluable information regarding how Ca V 1.1 detects changes in membrane potential and transmits intra- and inter-molecular signals which cause opening of the channel pore and support Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum remain elusive. Here, we review current perspectives on this topic including the recent application of functional site-directed fluorometry.

No abstract