No abstract

No abstract

Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with snare is the recommended technique to resect non-invasive colorectal neoplastic lesions between 10 and 30 mm in diameter. The objective of EMR is to resect completely the neoplastic tissue en bloc and preferably with free margins (R0), avoiding recurrences. Anchoring the tip of the snare in the submucosa is a technical trick that allows snare sliding to be reduced and larger pieces to be caught. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anchoring-EMR (A-EMR). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of A-EMR procedures for lesions of diameter between 10 and 30 mm (endoscopic evaluation) performed consecutively in four French centers between May 2017 and January 2018. A-EMR was routinely performed for all EMR using Olympus conventional snares (10 or 25 mm). The primary outcome was evaluation of the proportion of R0 resections. Results A total of 141 A-EMR procedures were performed by 10 operators. Mean lesion size was 19.8 mm. Anchoring was feasible in 96.5 % of cases. There were 81.6 % en bloc resections and 70.2 % R0 resections, with the percentage of procedures decreasing with increasing lesion size (82.8 % < 20 mm, 55.3 % 21 – 30 mm, and 50.0 % > 30 mm, P = 0.002). Complete perforations closed endoscopically occurred in 3/141 cases (2.1 %); none occurred in lesions < 20 mm in size (0 /87). Conclusion The A-EMR technique appears to be promising with a high proportion of R0 for lesions of 10 – 20 mm in size without any perforations. It could also offer an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or to hybrid techniques to reach R0 for lesions between 20 and 30 mm in size.

No abstract

Several recent studies have described the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the placement of lumen‐apposing metal stents (LAMS) for the treatment of gastrointestinal strictures. However, the optimum stent indwelling time is unclear. We reviewed the literature on endoscopic gastroenterostomy (GE) with a focus on the stent indwelling time and we described the first reported case of iatrogenic perforation six months after Axios stent placement. In the literature review (n = 239), the composite technical success rate and clinical success rate were 93.7% and 87.9%, respectively. The mean follow‐up period was 191 days, and the mean stent indwelling time was 88 days. Among 13 studies (n = 202), the mean rate of complications was 13.4%. The principal complication was mis‐deployment of the stent (4.5%). We report a case report of delayed iatrogenic perforation. A 59‐year‐old male patient with cystic dystrophy of the duodenum has been followed for several years. He presented with anorexia following duodenal obstruction and underwent endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gastrojejunostomy. Six months later, he was referred to our center due to septic shock, and abdominal computed tomography revealed peritonitis secondary to a perforation of the small intestine, opposite the Axios stent. The mean LAMS indwelling time after GE was 88 days. To minimise the rate of adverse events, such as ulceration and mucosal overgrowth, regular abdominal computed tomography and endoscopy can be performed to evaluate the local effect of the stent. When the disease has resolved, the LAMS must be removed as soon as possible.