Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) inoculation onto TCV-resistant Arabidopsis leads to a hypersensitive response (HR) controlled by the dominant gene HRT. HRT is a member of the class of resistance (R) genes that contain a leucine zipper, a nucleotide binding site, and leucine-rich repeats. The chromosomal position of HRT and its homology to resistance gene RPP8 and two RPP8 homologs indicate that unequal crossing over and gene conversion may have contributed to HRT evolution. RPP8 confers resistance to an oomycete pathogen, Peronospora parasitica. Despite very strong similarities within the HRT/RPP8 family, HRT and RPP8 are specific for the respective pathogens they detect. Hence, the HRT/RPP8 family provides molecular evidence that sequence changes between closely related members of multigene families can generate novel specificities for radically different pathogens. Transgenic plants expressing HRT developed an HR but generally remained susceptible to TCV because of a second gene, RRT, that regulates resistance to TCV. However, several transgenic plants that overexpressed HRT produced micro-HRs or no HR when inoculated with TCV and were resistant to infection. Expression of the TCV coat protein gene in seedlings containing HRT resulted in massive necrosis and death, indicating that the avirulence factor detected by the HRT-encoded protein is the TCV coat protein.

Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) inoculation onto TCV-resistant Arabidopsis leads to a hypersensitive response (HR) controlled by the dominant gene HRT . HRT is a member of the class of resistance ( R ) genes that contain a leucine zipper, a nucleotide binding site, and leucine-rich repeats. The chromosomal position of HRT and its homology to resistance gene RPP8 and two RPP8 homologs indicate that unequal crossing over and gene conversion may have contributed to HRT evolution. RPP8 confers resistance to an oomycete pathogen, Peronospora parasitica . Despite very strong similarities within the HRT/RPP8 family, HRT and RPP8 are specific for the respective pathogens they detect. Hence, the HRT/ RPP8 family provides molecular evidence that sequence changes between closely related members of multigene families can generate novel specificities for radically different pathogens. Transgenic plants expressing HRT developed an HR but generally remained susceptible to TCV because of a second gene, RRT , that regulates resistance to TCV. However, several transgenic plants that overexpressed HRT produced micro-HRs or no HR when inoculated with TCV and were resistant to infection. Expression of the TCV coat protein gene in seedlings containing HRT resulted in massive necrosis and death, indicating that the avirulence factor detected by the HRT -encoded protein is the TCV coat protein. INTRODUCTIONTo survive, plants must defend themselves against numerous pathogens. Some defenses are constitutive, such as various preformed antimicrobial compounds (Osbourn, 1996), whereas others are activated by recognition of pathogens (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1996;Yang et al., 1997). The key players in this recognition process include the product of a dominant or semidominant resistance ( R ) gene present in the plant and the corresponding dominant avirulence (Avr) factor encoded by or derived from the pathogen. Recognition of the Avr factor by the host plant initiates one or more signal transduction pathways that activate various plant defenses and thus compromise the ability of the pathogen to colonize the plant. In this gene-for-gene interaction, the prevailing thought is that the R protein either acts directly as the receptor of the Avr factor (Ellingboe, 1980; Bent, 1996;Yang et al., 1997) or recognizes the Avr factor indirectly through a coreceptor (Dixon et al., 1998). To date, direct interaction between an R protein and an Avr factor has been demonstrated only for the tomato Pto and the Pseudomonas syringae AvrPto proteins (Scofield et al., 1996;Tang et al., 1996) and between the rice Pi-ta and the Magnaporthe grisea AvrPita proteins (Jia et al., 1999).An array of R genes that provide protection against viruses, bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes has been cloned from both monocots and dicots during the past 6 years (Staskawicz et al., 1995; Bent, 1996; Baker et al., 1997; DeWit, 1997). Many contain a nucleotide binding site (NBS). Often located closer to the N terminus of the R protein is either a leucine zipper or a TIR domain, which is sim...

SummaryIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the SAC1 gene encodes a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase (PPIPase) that modulates the levels of phosphoinositides, which are key regulators of a number of signal transduction processes. SAC1p has been implicated in multiple cellular functions: actin cytoskeleton organization, secretory functions, inositol metabolism, ATP transport, and multiple-drug sensitivity. Here, we describe the characterization of three genes in Arabidopsis thaliana, AtSAC1a, AtSAC1b, and AtSAC1c, encoding proteins similar to those of yeast SAC1p. We demonstrated that the three AtSAC1 proteins are functional homologs of the yeast SAC1p because they can rescue the cold-sensitive and inositol auxotroph yeast sac1-null mutant strain. The fact that Arabidopsis and yeast SAC1 genes derived from a common ancestor suggests that this plant multigenic family is involved in the phosphoinositide pathway and in a range of cellular functions similar to those in yeast. Using GFP fusion experiments, we demonstrate that the three AtSAC1 proteins are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. Their expression patterns are overlapping, with at least two members expressed in each organ. Remarkably, AtSAC1 genes are not expressed during seed development, and therefore additional phosphatases are required to control phosphoinositide levels in seeds.

During the course of an Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequencing project, we identified a gene, G4, with a derived amino acid sequence showing homology to the product of the Rhodobacter capsulatus bchG locus which is involved in the esterification of bacteriochlorophyllide with geranylgeraniol. The relationship between this gene and bchG was confirmed by the isolation and analysis of a corresponding full-length cDNA. Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences indicated that the gene is made up of 14 exons, some of them being very short. Southern and Northern analyses showed that this sequence represents a single-copy gene and its transcript is detected only in green or greening tissues. Both homologies and expression data suggest that this gene encodes a chlorophyll synthetase, one of the last enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis, and thus represents a new example of a nuclear gene encoding an enzyme of this pathway in higher plants.

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) have the potential to serve as the basic materials for treating severe neural diseases and injuries. Ultrasound exposure is an effective therapy for nonunion fractures and healing fresh wounds through an easy and noninvasive application. According to the results of our preliminary study, low-intensity ultrasound (LIUS) promotes the attachment and differentiation of NSPCs. However, the parameters of and mechanisms by which LIUS induces NSPC differentiation remain unclear. To the best of our knowledge, no published studies have reported and compared the biological effects of dual-frequency and single-frequency LIUS on NSPCs. The purpose of this study is to systematically compare several LIUS parameters, including single-frequency, single-transducer dual-frequency ultrasound, burst, and continuous cycling stimulation at several intensities. Furthermore, synergistic effects of single-/dual-frequency LIUS combined with neural growth factor addition on NSPCs were also evaluated. Based on the results of the cytotoxicity assay, low-intensity (40 kPa) ultrasound does not damage NSPCs compared with that observed in the control group. The morphology and immunostaining results show that all experimental groups exposed to ultrasound exhibit neurite outgrowth and NSPC differentiation. In particular, dual-frequency ultrasound promotes NSPCs differentiation to a greater extent than single-frequency ultrasound. In addition, more complicated and denser neural networks are observed in the dual-frequency group. Neural growth factor addition increased the percentage of neurons formed, particularly in the groups stimulated with ultrasound. Among these groups, the dual-frequency group exhibited significant differences in the percentage of differentiated neurons compared with the single-frequency group. This study may the first to prove that dual-frequency LIUS exposure further enhances NSPC differentiation and the utilization of growth factors than single-frequency LIUS. Moreover, the result also revealed that dual-frequency ultrasound generated higher calcium ion influx and extended the channel opening time. A potential explanation is that dual-frequency ultrasound generates more stable cavitation than single-frequency LIUS, which may stimulate cell membrane mechanochannels and enhance calcium ion influx but does not damage them. This in vitro study may serve as a useful alternative for ultrasound therapy.