Peripheral immune tolerance is generally thought to result from cross-presentation of tissue-derived proteins by quiescent tissue-resident dendritic cells to self-reactive T cells that have escaped thymic negative selection, leading to anergy or deletion. Recently, we and others have implicated the lymph node (LN) stroma in mediating CD8 T cell peripheral tolerance. We demonstrate that LN-resident lymphatic endothelial cells express multiple peripheral tissue antigens (PTAs) independent of the autoimmune regulator (Aire). They directly present an epitope derived from one of these, the melanocyte-specific protein tyrosinase, to tyrosinase-specific CD8 T cells, leading to their deletion. We also show that other LN stromal subpopulations express distinct PTAs by mechanisms that vary in their Aire dependence. These results establish lymphatic endothelial cells, and potentially other LN-resident cells, as systemic mediators of peripheral immune tolerance.

Lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) induce peripheral tolerance by direct presentation to CD8 T cells (T CD8) IntroductionIt has been well established that intrinsic peripheral tolerance in self-reactive T cells occurs through anergy or deletion. Early work demonstrated that anergy in vitro was because of lack of CD28 costimulation, 1 which also led to deletional tolerance in vivo. 2,3 However, in other models, CD28 costimulation was required for tolerance induction. 4,5 In addition, induction of peripheral deletion and/or anergy in vivo could be reversed by costimulation through CD27, 4-1BB, and OX40. 6,7 While these costimulatory pathways operate at distinct points in the response of T cells to foreign antigens, they all induce IL-2 production, [8][9][10][11] and are associated with up-regulation of antiapoptotic molecules and enhanced survival. 10,[12][13][14] However, the basis for their reversal of tolerance induction has not been established.Inhibitory signals through programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and B-and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) receptors, via their ligands programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 (B7-H1; also known as PD-L1) and herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), also have been reported to diminish T-cell accumulation and/or acquisition of effector activity in in vitro 15 and in vivo [16][17][18][19][20] models of tolerance. Interfering with these pathways enables self-reactive T cells to accumulate in secondary lymphoid organs and become fully differentiated effectors that cause autoimmunity. [16][17][18][19] Inhibitory signals through lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) also diminish T-cell accumulation in peripheral tissue in vivo, 21 but a role for LAG-3 in CD8 T-cell (T CD8 ) tolerance induction in secondary lymphoid organs has not been established. In response to foreign antigens, signaling via these inhibitory pathways is associated with inhibition of IL-2 production [22][23][24] and diminished expression of antiapoptotic molecules. 23 However, it has yet to be clearly established how a lack of costimulation and inhibitory signaling are related to one another during peripheral tolerance induction. Finally, the cells that express the ligands for these inhibitory receptors during peripheral tolerance induction in vivo have yet to be identified.Peripheral tolerance has classically been ascribed to dendritic cells (DCs) that cross-present self-antigen acquired from peripheral tissues. 25 More recently, it has been demonstrated that it can also be mediated via direct presentation by 3 different lymph node (LN) stromal cell (LNSC) populations, including extrathymic Aireexpressing cells, 26 fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), 27 and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). 28 We previously reported that LECs directly present an epitope derived from tyrosinase, a melanocyte differentiation protein that is recognized by T CD8 recovered from melanoma and vitiligo patients, and induce peripheral tolerance through deletion of tyrosinase-specific T CD8 . 28 Here, we determined the roles of both costimulatory and ...

We showed previously that substitution of the first residue of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) fusion peptide Gly1 with Glu abolishes fusion activity. In the present study we asked whether this striking phenotype was due to the charge or side-chain volume of the substituted Glu. To do this we generated and characterized six mutants with substitutions at position 1: Gly1 to Ala, Ser, Val, Glu, Gln, or Lys. We found the following. All mutants were expressed at the cell surface, could be cleaved from the precursor (HA0) to the fusion permissive form (HA1-S-S-HA2), bound antibodies against the major antigenic site, bound red blood cells, and changed conformation at low pH. Only Gly, Ala, and Ser supported lipid mixing during fusion with red blood cells. Only Gly and Ala supported content mixing. Ser HA, therefore, displayed a hemifusion phenotype. The hemifusion phenotype of Ser HA was confirmed by electrophysiological studies. Our findings indicate that the first residue of the HA fusion peptide must be small (e.g., Gly, Ala, or Ser) to promote lipid mixing and must be small and apolar (e.g., Gly or Ala) to support both lipid and content mixing. The finding that Val HA displays no fusion activity underscores the idea that hydrophobicity is not the sole factor dictating fusion peptide function. The surprising finding that Ser HA displays hemifusion suggests that the HA ectodomain functions not only in the first stage of fusion, lipid mixing, but also, either directly or indirectly, in the second stage of fusion, content mixing.

No abstract

We tested the role of the “spring-loaded” conformational change in the fusion mechanism of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) by assessing the effects of 10 point mutants in the region of high coiled-coil propensity, HA2 54–81. The mutants included proline substitutions at HA2 55, 71, and 80, as well as a double proline substitution at residues 55 and 71. Mutants were expressed in COS or 293T cells and assayed for cell surface expression and structural features as well as for their ability to change conformation and induce fusion at low pH. We found the following: Specific mutations affected the precise carbohydrate structure and folding of the HA trimer. All of the mutants, however, formed trimers that could be expressed at the cell surface in a form that could be proteolytically cleaved from the precursor, HA0, to the fusion-permissive form, HA1-S-S-HA2. All mutants reacted with an antibody against the major antigenic site and bound red blood cells. Seven out of ten mutants displayed a wild-type (wt) or moderately elevated pH dependence for the conformational change. V55P displayed a substantial reduction (∼60– 80%) in the initial rate of lipid mixing. The other single mutants displayed efficient fusion with the same pH dependence as wt-HA. The double proline mutant V55P/ S71P displayed no fusion activity despite being well expressed at the cell surface as a proteolytically cleaved trimer that could bind red blood cells and change conformation at low pH. The impairment in fusion for both V55P and V55P/S71P was at the level of outer leaflet lipid mixing. We interpret our results in support of the hypothesis that the spring-loaded conformational change is required for fusion. An alternate model is discussed.