Background and Aim Obesity often coexists with diabetes, especially abdominal obesity, recognized as a risk factor for diabetic complications. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as one of the most common microvascular complications of diabetes, may be associated with these indices. Lipid accumulation product (LAP) and Chinese visceral obesity index (CVAI) are novel visceral obesity indicators, which have been proven to be an influential factor predicting type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, the correlation among LAP, CVAI, and DR still lacks systematic research in T2DM. The study aimed to explore the relationship among LAP, CVAI levels in different DR stages of T2DM patients and the diagnostic efficacy of LAP and CVAI for DR. Methods A total of 263 participants were recruited in this cross-sectional study. We enrolled 169 patients with T2DM, divided into the non-DR group (NDR, n = 61), non-proliferative DR group (NPDR, n = 55), and proliferative DR group (PDR, n = 53). And we also enrolled 94 healthy control participants. We collected demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical data on each subject. LAP and CVAI are calculated according to different formulas for men and women. Results Compared with the control group, LAP and CVAI were significantly higher (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, LAP (OR: 1.029, 95CI%: 1.010–1.049, P < 0.05), WC (OR: 1.073, 95CI%: 1.009–1.141, P < 0.05) and CVAI (OR: 1.017, 95CI%: 1.000–1.033, P < 0.05) were all associated with an increased risk of DR. Furthermore, increased LAP (OR: 1.020, 95% CI: 0.100–0.290) is associated with DR severity (P < 0.001). Moreover, the LAP had the most significant area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) (AUC = 0.728, 95% CI: 0.653–0.804). Conclusion A high LAP is associated with an increased risk of DR in T2DM patients, and the LAP index appears to be a good predictor of DR risk and severity in patients with T2DM, compared with BMI, WC, and CVAI.

Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, which is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD). The index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB) and the frontal QRS-T angle are recommended to predict the risk of ventricular arrhythmias more than other ECG parameters. However, the relationships between these two markers and DR have not yet been explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the variation in the iCEB, corrected iCEB (iCEBc) and frontal QRS-T angle in different stages of DR and determine whether there are associations between these markers and DR. Methods The sample comprised 665 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were classified into three groups: no DR (NDR), mild to moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and vision-threatening DR (VTDR). Twelve-lead ECG was performed and the QT, QTc, QRS duration, iCEB, iCEBc and frontal QRS-T angle were recorded and compared across the groups. Results The VTDR group had a significantly higher iCEBc and frontal QRS-T angle than the NDR and NPDR groups. After controlling for confounding variables, the correlations between the iCEBc (OR=2.217, 95% CI=1.464–3.358, P<0.001), frontal QRS-T angle (OR=1.017, 95% CI=1.008–1.025, P<0.001) and DR risk remained (P<0.05). Subjects in the fourth iCEBc quartile (adjusted OR=2.612, 95% CI=1.411–4.834, p=0.002) had a much higher chance of developing DR compared to those in the first quartile. In comparison to the first frontal QRS-T angle quartile, subjects in the third (adjusted OR=1.998, 95% CI=1.167–3.422, P=0.012) and fourth (adjusted OR=2.430, 95% CI=1.420–4.160, P=0.001) frontal QRS-T angle quartiles had significantly greater risks of DR. Conclusion With the progression of DR, the iCEBc and frontal QRS-T angle increase. An increased iCEBc and frontal QRS-T angle are associated with an increased risk of DR.