Background Periodontitis is a common and chronic inflammatory disease characterized by irreversible destruction of the tooth surrounding tissues, especially intrabony defects, which eventually lead to tooth loss. In recent years, stem cell-based therapy for periodontitis has been gradually applied to the clinic, but whether stem cell-based therapy plays a positive role in periodontal regeneration is unclear at present. Methods The clinical studies related to the evaluation of mesenchymal stem cells for periodontal regeneration in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science (WOS), Embase, Scopus, Wanfang and China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched in June 2023. The inclusion criteria required the studies to compare the efficacy of stem cell-based therapy with stem cell free therapy for the treatment periodontitis, and to have a follow-up for at least six months. Two evaluators searched, screened, and assessed the quality and the risk of bias in the included studies independently. Review Manager 5.4 software was used to perform the meta-analysis, and GRADEpro GDT was used to evaluate the level of the evidence. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 118 patients were analyzed. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that stem cell-based therapy showed better therapeutic effects on clinical attachment level (CAL) (MD = − 1.18, 95% CI = − 1.55, − 0.80, P < 0.00001), pocket probing depth (PPD) (MD = − 0.75, 95% CI = − 1.35, − 0.14, P = 0.020), and linear distance from bone crest to bottom of defect (BC-BD)( MD = − 0.95, 95% CI = − 1.67, − 0.23, P = 0.010) compared with cell-free group. However, stem cell-based therapy presented insignificant effects on gingival recession (P = 0.14), linear distance from cementoenamel junction to bottom of defect (P = 0.05). Conclusion The results demonstrate that stem cell-based therapy may be beneficial for CAL, PPD and BC-BD. Due to the limited number of studies included, the strength of the results in this analysis was affected to a certain extent. The high‐quality RCTs with large sample size, multi-blind, multi-centric are still required, and the methodological and normative clinical study protocol should be established and executed in the future.

As a new drug for local dental anesthesia, articaine has become popular in the clinic in recent years. In this review, we describe the development of articaine, explain its mechanism of action, compare its efficacy with that of other commonly used local anesthetics in dental treatment, and summarize the application of articaine in special populations. In conclusion, the anesthetic efficacy of articaine in clinical dental treatment is better than that of lidocaine, and its safety is not statistically different from that of lidocaine. In particular, articaine has several advantages and can be selected flexibly for clinical use. Atecaine has great potential for wide application in dental clinics in the near future.

No abstract

To evaluate the modified star-shaped incision on gingival sulcus for reducing horizontal food impaction around implant-supported restoration. Total 24 patients receiving bone-level implant placement were enrolled, a star-shaped incision was made on the gingiva sulcus before the placement of zirconia crown. Follow-up examination was carried out 3 and 6 months after final restoration, respectively. Assessment of soft tissue includes papilla height, modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, periodontal depth, gingival biotype and gingival margin level. Marginal bone level was measured on periapical radiographs. Only 1 patient complained about the horizontal food impaction. Both the mesial and distal papilla almost filled the entire proximal space, in good harmony with the adjacent papillae. No recession of the gingival margin was found around the crown even in the patients with thin gingival biotype. Other parameters of soft tissue including modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index and periodontal depth remained low during the whole follow-up visit. The resorption of marginal crestal bone was less than 0.6 mm during the first 6 month, and there was no significant difference among baseline, 3-month and 6-month visit. The modified star-shaped incision on the gingiva sulcus maintained the gingival papilla height and reduced the occurrence of horizontal food impaction, and no recession of the gingiva margin was found around implant-supported restoration.

Background: To evaluate the modified star-shaped incision on gingival sulcus for reducing horizontal food impaction around implant-supported restoration.Methods: Total 24 patients receiving bone-level implant placement were enrolled, a star-shaped incision was made on the gingiva sulcus before the placement of zirconia crown. Follow-up examination was carried out 3 and 6 months after final restoration, respectively. Assessment of soft tissue includes papilla height, modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, periodontal depth, gingival biotype and gingival margin level. Marginal bone level was measured on periapical radiographs. Results: Only 1 patient complained about the horizontal food impaction. Both the mesial and distal papilla almost filled the entire proximal space, in good harmony with the adjacent papillae. No recession of the gingival margin was found around the crown even in the patients with thin gingival biotype. Other parameters of soft tissue including modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index and periodontal depth remained low during the whole follow-up visit. The resorption of marginal crestal bone was less than 0.6 mm during the first 6 month, and there was no significant difference among baseline, 3-month and 6-month visit. Conclusion: The modified star-shaped incision on the gingiva sulcus maintained the gingival papilla height and reduced the occurrence of horizontal food impaction, and no recession of the gingiva margin was found around implant-supported restoration.