No abstract

Metabolomic analysis of tissue samples can be applied across multiple fields including medicine, toxicology, and environmental sciences. A thorough evaluation of several metabolite extraction procedures from tissues is therefore warranted. This has been achieved at two research laboratories using muscle and liver tissues from fish. Multiple replicates of homogenous tissues were extracted using the following solvent systems of varying polarities: perchloric acid, acetonitrile/water, methanol/water, and methanol/chloroform/water. Extraction of metabolites from ground wet tissue, ground dry tissue, and homogenized wet tissue was also compared. The hydrophilic metabolites were analyzed using 1-dimensional (1D) 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and projections of 2-dimensional J-resolved (p-JRES) NMR, and the spectra evaluated using principal components analysis. Yield, reproducibility, ease, and speed were the criteria for assessing the quality of an extraction protocol for metabolomics. Both laboratories observed that the yields of low molecular weight metabolites were similar among the solvent extractions; however, acetonitrile-based extractions provided poorer fractionation and extracted lipids and macromolecules into the polar solvent. Extraction using perchloric acid produced the greatest variation between replicates due to peak shifts in the spectra, while acetonitrile-based extraction produced highest reproducibility. Spectra from extraction of ground wet tissues generated more macromolecules and lower reproducibility compared with other tissue disruption methods. The p-JRES NMR approach reduced peak congestion and yielded flatter baselines, and subsequently separated the metabolic fingerprints of different samples more clearly than by 1D NMR. Overall, single organic solvent extractions are quick and easy and produce reasonable results. However, considering both yield and reproducibility of the hydrophilic metabolites as well as recovery of the hydrophobic metabolites, we conclude that the methanol/chloroform/water extraction is the preferred method.

Several fundamental requirements must be met so that NMR-based metabolomics and the related technique of metabonomics can be formally adopted into environmental monitoring and chemical risk assessment. Here we report an intercomparison exercise which has evaluated the effectiveness of 1H NMR metabolomics to generate comparable data sets from environmentally derived samples. It focuses on laboratory practice that follows sample collection and metabolite extraction, specifically the final stages of sample preparation, NMR data collection (500, 600, and 800 MHz), data processing, and multivariate analysis. Seven laboratories have participated from the U.S.A., Canada, U.K., and Australia, generating a total of ten data sets. Phase 1 comprised the analysis of synthetic metabolite mixtures, while Phase 2 investigated European flounder (Platichthys flesus) liver extracts from clean and contaminated sites. Overall, the comparability of data sets from the participating laboratories was good. Principal components analyses (PCA) of the individual data sets yielded ten highly similar scores plots for the synthetic mixtures, with a comparable result for the liver extracts. Furthermore, the same metabolic biomarkers that discriminated fish from clean and contaminated sites were discovered by all the laboratories. PCA of the combined data sets showed excellent clustering of the multiple analyses. These results demonstrate that NMR-based metabolomics can generate data that are sufficiently comparable between laboratories to support its continued evaluation for regulatory environmental studies.