ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) of young women with or without low prognosis according to the POSEIDON criteria after IVF/ICSI cycles and to investigate whether the diagnosis of low prognosis increases the risk of abnormal birth outcomes.DesignRetrospective study.SettingA single reproductive medicine center.PopulationFrom January 2016 to October 2020, there were 17,893 patients (<35 years) involved. After screening, 4,105 women were included in POSEIDON group 1, 1,375 women were included in POSEIDON group 3, and 11,876 women were defined as non-POSEIDON.Intervention(s)Baseline serum AMH level was measured on the D2–D3 of menstrual cycle before IVF/ICSI treatment.Main outcome measure(s)Cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), birth outcomes.Result(s)After four stimulation cycles, the CLBRs in POSEIDON group 1, POSEIDON group 3, and non-POSEIDON group reached 67.9% (95% CI, 66.5%–69.3%), 51.9% (95% CI, 49.2%–54.5%), and 79.6% (95% CI, 78.9%–80.3%), respectively. There was no difference in gestational age, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, and low birth weight infants between the three groups, but macrosomia was significantly higher in non-POSEIDON group, after adjusting for maternal age and BMI.Conclusion(s)The POSEIDON group shows lower CLBRs than the non-POSEIDON group in young women, while the risk of abnormal birth outcomes in the POSEIDON group will not increase.

Backgroundoocyte maturation arrest (OMA) is currently one of the major causes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure, and several gene mutations were found to be associated with OMA. The purpose of this study was to identify the oocyte phenotype, genetic diagnosis, and clinical outcomes of patients with OMA and explore their possible interrelationships, thus providing a more individualized and efficient treatment strategy guidance accordingly.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, involving 28 infertile women with OMA in the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tongji Hospital from 2018 to 2021. Whole-exome sequencing was performed for the detection of gene mutations. Patients were classified into three groups based on their oocyte phenotype, and for each group, the immature oocytes were cultured in vitro and mature oocytes were fertilized to evaluate both the maturation capacity and developmental potential. The clinical outcomes of OMA patients with different gene mutations or from different groups were further analyzed and compared.ResultsTwenty-eight women with OMA were evaluated in this study. According to the stage of OMA, 14 (50.0%) women were classified as OMA Type-1 (GV arrest), 5 (17.9%) were OMA Type-2 (MI arrest), and 9 (32.1%) were OMA Type-3 (with both GV and MI arrest). Immature oocytes from OMA patients exhibited significantly lower maturation rates even after IVM, compared to those in general patients. Seven patients (25.0%) were detected to have deleterious variations in two genes (PATL2 and TUBB8), known to be associated with the OMA phenotype. Patients with identified mutations were found to have little opportunity to obtain offspring with their own oocytes. Among the patients without mutations identified, those classified as OMA Type-1 or Type-3 still had a chance to obtain offspring through IVF or natural pregnancy, while all patients in the Type-2 group failed to obtain live birth.ConclusionsThree different phenotypes were observed in patients with OMA. The clinical outcomes of patients were associated with the presence of gene mutations and the classification of oocyte phenotype, thus a reasonable triage system was proposed to optimize the allocation of health care resources and maximize patient benefit.

Background Previous studies have discussed the pregnancy outcomes of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) patients. However, data on embryonic development potential, neonatal outcomes, and maternal complications of DOR patients still remained unknown. This is the first study to investigate the risk of DOR on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes among women < 38 years. Methods Retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients (< 38 years of age) undergoing their first oocyte retrieval cycle were included. Patients were divided into DOR group and non-DOR group. Pregnancy outcomes of fresh cycle and cumulative live birth rate and perinatal outcomes after one oocyte retrieved cycle were compared between DOR and non-DOR group. Result(s) From January 2016 to September 2020, there were 8,179 patients involved: 443 patients in the DOR group and 7,736 patients in the non-DOR group. The incidences of live birth and clinical pregnancy did not differ significantly between patients with or without DOR after fresh cycle transfer, but the cumulative live birth rate was significantly lower in DOR group. Among women who had singleton live births, after binary logistic regression, the rates of maternal complications and neonatal outcomes were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion(s) DOR patients (< 38 years of age) showed similar pregnancy outcomes in the first fresh embryo transfer cycle but a lower chance of live birth after a whole oocyte retrieval cycle to non-DOR patients and DOR is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.