We investigated whether PPAR-γ2 gene polymorphisms are associated with serum lipids and the occurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) prospectively characterised for the presence or absence of Type 2 diabetes in a Turkish population. Our study included 202 patients with CHD (102 with diabetes, 100 without diabetes) and 105 controls. PPARγ genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP technique. The PPARγ-C161T CC homozygote genotype was associated with significantly increased CHD risk when compared with the T allele carriers (CT+TT) in CHD patients with diabetes (OR:1.951, 95%CI: 1.115-3.415, P = 0.019), whereas PPARγ-P12A polymorphism was not associated with CHD risk (P > 0.05). Serum HDL-C levels were significantly lower in controls with the P12A heterozygote when compared with the P12P homozygote (P = 0.002). In the CHD patients with diabetes, CT heterozygote genotype showed higher serum triglyceride than the CC homozygote genotype (CT:2.42 ± 1.89 vs. CC:1.61 ± 0.21, P = 0.015). Our findings shows the association of these two polymorphisms with serum triglyceride levels, which was increased in the order of P12P-CC < P12P-CT < P12A-CC < P12A-CT in the CHD patients with diabetes. Furthermore, we observed that the increasing effects of the CT genotype on serum triglyceride levels could be modified by PPARγ P12A polymorphism (P12A-CT:2.30 ± 1.75 vs. P12P-CC:1.79 ± 1.14, P = 0.028). We suggested that homozygote CC genotype of the PPARγ C161T polymorphism might be associated with an increased CHD risk especially in patients with diabetes. We observed that the C161T CT heterozygote genotype shows an unfavorable effect on serum lipid profile in CHD patients with diabetes and this effect was weaken with the presence of P12P homozygote genotype.
It has been suggested that the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes as possibly implicated in reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporosis. The present study investigated the relation of ERα PvuII/XbaI polymorphisms and VDR FokI/TaqI polymorphisms with BMD in Turkish postmenopausal women. Eighty-one osteoporotic and 122 osteopenic postmenopausal women were recruited. For detection of the polymorphisms, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment lenght polymorphism techniques have been used. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and hip by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Distributions of ERα (PvuII dbSNP: rs2234693, XbaI dbSNP: rs9340799) and VDR genotypes (FokI dbSNP rs10735810, TaqI dbSNP: rs731236) were similar in study population. Although overall prevalence of osteoporosis had no association with these genotypes, the prevalence of decreased femoral neck BMD values were higher in the subjects with ERα PvuII "PP" and ERα XbaI "XX" genotypes than in those with "Pp/pp" genotypes and "xx" genotype, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, subjects with VDR FokI "FF" genotype had lower BMD values of femoral neck and total hip compared to those with "Ff" genotype (P < 0.05). In the logistic regression analysis, we confirmed the presence of relationships between the VDR FokI "FF" genotypes, BMI ≤ 27.5, age ≥ 55 and the increased risk of femoral neck BMD below 0.8 value in postmenopausal women. The present data suggests that the ERα PvuII/XbaI and VDR FokI polymorphisms may contribute to the determination of bone mineral density in Turkish postmenopausal women.
Researchers have started focusing on investigating the anticarcinogenic effects of natural products with the slightest side effects possible, because current breast cancer treatment approaches are unable to achieve absolute success especially on aggressive subtypes. Propolis is among these products with its antimicrobial, antifungal, anti‐inflammatory, and anticancer effects. Therefore, seven different samples were collected from different regions (Argentina, China, and Istanbul‐Turkey) and applied on nonaggressive breast cancer cell line (BCCL) MCF‐7 and aggressive cell lines SK‐BR‐3, and MDA‐MB‐231. Initially, the phenolic/flavonoid constituents of the propolis ethanol extracts were investigated by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry (LS‐MS/MS) and high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses. Then, the anticarcinogenic effects of the propolis samples on MCF‐7, SK‐BR‐3, MDA‐MB‐231 were evaluated by WST1 analysis and only selected ones on MCF‐10A and hPdLF. According to the LS‐MS/MS and HPLC analysis, Turkey originated propolis (Turkey3) were found to be richer than the other propolis samples in terms of phenolic/flavonoid compounds. Turkey propolis significantly inhibited cell proliferation in both nonaggressive and aggressive BCCL (P < 0.01). Therefore, Turkey3 propolis was selected for further evaluation using Annexin V‐PI apoptosis detection assays. In addition, selected compounds among the propolis contents such as galangin, caffeic acid, apigenin, quercetin, and ferulic acid were applied to the MCF‐7 cell line to detect cytotoxic and apoptotic effects. Galangin, caffeic acid, apigenin, and quercetin remarkably induced cell proliferation inhibition at all time intervals, whereas ferulic acid was found non efficient on the MCF‐7 cell line. Annexin V‐PI assay clarified that all cell proliferation inhibitions were markedly apoptotic. Our findings indicated that the inhibition effect of propolis on breast cancer cell proliferation was in a propolis type‐, dose‐ and time‐dependent fashion. Turkey3 propolis showed statistically significant cytotoxic effects on both the nonaggressive and aggressive BCCL. These findings were consistent with the effects of its rich phenolic and flavonoid contents, in terms of variety. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 71(5):619–631, 2019
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.