In vitro osteoclastogenesis is a central assay in bone biology to study the effect of genetic and pharmacologic cues on the differentiation of bone resorbing osteoclasts. To date, identification of TRAP+ multinucleated cells and measurements of osteoclast number and surface rely on a manual tracing requiring specially trained lab personnel. This task is tedious, time-consuming, and prone to operator bias. Here, we propose to replace this laborious manual task with a completely automatic process using algorithms developed for computer vision. To this end, we manually annotated full cultures by contouring each cell, and trained a machine learning algorithm to detect and classify cells into preosteoclast (TRAP+ cells with 1–2 nuclei), osteoclast type I (cells with more than 3 nuclei and less than 15 nuclei), and osteoclast type II (cells with more than 15 nuclei). The training usually requires thousands of annotated samples and we developed an approach to minimize this requirement. Our novel strategy was to train the algorithm by working at “patch-level” instead of on the full culture, thus amplifying by >20-fold the number of patches to train on. To assess the accuracy of our algorithm, we asked whether our model measures osteoclast number and area at least as well as any two trained human annotators. The results indicated that for osteoclast type I cells, our new model achieves a Pearson correlation (r) of 0.916 to 0.951 with human annotators in the estimation of osteoclast number, and 0.773 to 0.879 for estimating the osteoclast area. Because the correlation between 3 different trained annotators ranged between 0.948 and 0.958 for the cell count and between 0.915 and 0.936 for the area, we can conclude that our trained model is in good agreement with trained lab personnel, with a correlation that is similar to inter-annotator correlation. Automation of osteoclast culture quantification is a useful labor-saving and unbiased technique, and we suggest that a similar machine-learning approach may prove beneficial for other morphometrical analyses.

The two erythropoietin (EPO) receptor forms mediate different cellular responses to erythropoietin. While hematopoiesis is mediated via the homodimeric EPO receptor (EPOR), tissue protection is conferred via a heteromer composed of EPOR and CD131. In the skeletal system, EPO stimulates osteoclast precursors and induces bone loss. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are still elusive. Here, we evaluated the role of the heteromeric complex in bone metabolism in vivo and in vitro by using Cibinetide (CIB), a non-erythropoietic EPO analogue that exclusively binds the heteromeric receptor. CIB is administered either alone or in combination with EPO. One month of CIB treatment significantly increased the cortical (~5.8%) and trabecular (~5.2%) bone mineral density in C57BL/6J WT female mice. Similarly, administration of CIB for five consecutive days to female mice that concurrently received EPO on days one and four, reduced the number of osteoclast progenitors, defined by flow cytometry as Lin−CD11b−Ly6Chi CD115+, by 42.8% compared to treatment with EPO alone. In addition, CIB alone or in combination with EPO inhibited osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Our findings introduce CIB either as a stand-alone treatment, or in combination with EPO, as an appealing candidate for the treatment of the bone loss that accompanies EPO treatment.

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine that classically drives erythropoiesis but can also induce bone loss by decreasing bone formation and increasing resorption. Deletion of the EPO receptor (EPOR) on osteoblasts or B cells partially mitigates the skeletal effects of EPO, thereby implicating a contribution by EPOR on other cell lineages. This study was designed to define the role of monocyte EPOR in EPO-mediated bone loss, by using two mouse lines with conditional deletion of EPOR in the monocytic lineage. Low-dose EPO attenuated the reduction in bone volume (BV/TV) in Cx3cr1Cre EPORf/f female mice (27.05%) compared to controls (39.26%), but the difference was not statistically significant. To validate these findings, we increased the EPO dose in LysMCre model mice, a model more commonly used to target preosteoclasts. There was a significant reduction in both the increase in the proportion of bone marrow preosteoclasts (CD115+) observed following high-dose EPO administration and the resulting bone loss in LysMCre EPORf/f female mice (44.46% reduction in BV/TV) as compared to controls (77.28%), without interference with the erythropoietic activity. Our data suggest that EPOR in the monocytic lineage is at least partially responsible for driving the effect of EPO on bone mass.

Background and aims: Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine, which besides its classical role in driving erythropoiesis, displays tissue protective and immunomodulatory activities. EPO also induces bone loss. While hematopoiesis is mediated via the homodimeric EPO receptor (EPOR), tissue protection is conferred via a heteromer composed of EPOR and CD131. Cibinetide (CIB), a non-erythropoietic analogue of EPO, specifically binds to the heteromeric receptor and confers tissue protection. Our published findings that EPO stimulates osteoclast precursors and entrains a decrease in bone density, raise questions regarding the underlying molecular mechanisms. Here, we evaluated the role of the heteromeric complex in bone metabolism using CIB alone and in combination with EPO in vivo and in vitro. Results: CIB injections to 12-week-old female mice (120 µg/kg thrice weekly for 4 weeks) resulted in a significant increase in tissue mineral density in cortical bone by 5.8% (1416.4±39.27 vs 1338.74±16.56 mgHA/cm 3) and in trabecular bone by 5.2% (1056.52±30.94 vs 1004.13±16.91 mg HA/cm 3) (n=10 in each group, p< 0.05 versus saline-injected controls), as measured by microCT (Figure 1A). To evaluate the capacity of CIB to attenuate EPO mediated bone loss, we administered CIB (300 µg/kg) for 5 consecutive days, to 13-week-old female mice that also received 2 injections of 120U EPO on days 1 and 4. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a 1.8-fold reduction in the number of osteoclast progenitors, defined as Lin -CD11b −CD115 +Ly6C hi, in the EPO + CIB injected mice, compared to the mice injected with EPO alone (n=7 in each group, p< 0.05). Hemoglobin levels and TER119 + bone marrow (BM) erythroid progenitors were similar in both groups. In vitro, EPO administration to BM-derived macrophages (BMDM) enhanced osteoclastogenesis, whereas CIB had an opposite, dose-dependent effect. Combining CIB with EPO inhibited osteoclastogenesis in BMDM, suggesting that CIB overrides the pro-osteoclastogenic effect of EPO (Figure 1B). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the increasing complexity of EPOR signaling in bone and pave the way for clinical translation through potential combination therapy of EPO and CIB in anemic and in cancer patients. Adjunctive administration of CIB may prevent or attenuate bone loss while preserving the erythropoietic actions of EPO. This study was supported by a grant from the Dotan Hemato-oncology Fund, the Cancer Biology Research Center, Tel Aviv University to DN and YG. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.