Organizational productivity is certainly inseparable from the influence of employee recruitment, how management efforts include various policies and practices implemented by managers in an effort to improve employee performance and productivity, selection criteria refer to attributes or characteristics used to select new employees in the recruitment process, then the quality of service with the support of employee improvement. The purpose of this study is to prove the influence of recruitment, management efforts, selection criteria and also the quality of servants on organizational productivity. The second objective is to determine the effect of employee improvement on organizational productivity. This research design uses a quantitative research approach with primary data sources. The population of this study was teachers and employees of SMP – SMA Yayasan Mutiara Ilmu Kisaran as many as 60 respondents. This research analysis technique uses path analysis with the help of SmartPLS software Decision making in this study uses a P-Value value with a significance value of 0.05 with assumptions if the P-Value < 0.05 is declared to have a significant effect on each research variable with a P-Value value of 0.5198558. The results of this study prove that the effect of recruitment has a positive and significant effect on organizational productivity, and does not have a positive and significant effect on employee improvement. Management's efforts have no effect on organizational productivity and on the contrary have a positive effect on employee improvement.
Selection criteria have a positive and significant effect on organizational productivity and selection criteria do not affect employee improvement. Service quality has a positive and significant effect on organizational productivity and service quality also has a positive and significant effect on employee improvement.
This study aims to determine how the application of the method of Activity-Based Costing in determining the tariff for inpatient hospital Husada Utama Surabaya and compared with a rate home services inpatient approved hospital with tariff services using Activity-Based Costing the approach of activity -aktivitas in providing products or services to determine the amount of the costs incurred. This research uses descriptive method. Research using primary data with a direct review of the research object, conduct interviews and make observations or direct observations. Inpatient services tariff calculation using the ABC method, performed in two stages. That is the first expense traced to the activity which raises the cost and the second stage charge activity to the product. While the rates obtained by adding the cost of hospitalization with the expected profit. The results obtained from the calculation of rates of hospitalization services using Activity-Based Costing namely to class Suite Rp. 1,434,298, Rp VVIP class. 1,141,516, VIP Rp. 757 680, Class I USD. 706 888, class II Rp. 643 385, and class III Rp. 616 269. So in the ABC method, has been able to allocate the cost of assets to each room is right by the consumption of each activity. From the results of this study using the assumption, researchers recommend that hospital is expected to reduce rates of hospitalization services in class suite, VVIP and VIP in order to attract patients to use the services of hospitalization. As for Class I, Class II and Class III, if the tariff wants to be maintained, it is recommended to class I order the tariff was increased to get a big profit, and for class II and class III is expected to add beds or full capacity.Keywords: Activity Based Costing, Hospitals, Rates services, Inpatient
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.