It is well known that electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves play an important role in controlling particle dynamics inside the Earth's magnetosphere, especially in the outer radiation belt. In order to understand the results of wave‐particle interactions due to EMIC waves, it is important to know how the waves are distributed and what features they have. In this paper, we present some statistical analyses on the spatial distribution of EMIC waves in the low Earth orbit by using Swarm satellites from December 2013 to June 2017 (~3.5 years) as a function of magnetic local time, magnetic latitude, and magnetic longitude. We also study the wave characteristics such as ellipticity, wave normal angle, peak frequency, and wave power using our automatic wave detection algorithm based on the method of Bortnik et al. (2007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011900). We also investigate the geomagnetic control of the EMIC waves by comparing with geomagnetic activity represented by Kp and Dst indices. We find that EMIC waves are detected with a peak occurrence rate at midlatitude including subauroral region, dawn sector (3–7 magnetic local time), and linear polarization dominated with an oblique propagating direction to the background magnetic field. In addition, our result shows that the waves have some relation with geomagnetic activity; that is, they occur preferably during the geomagnetic storm's late recovery phase at low Earth orbit.

Low Earth orbit satellites frequently encounter Pc1 pulsations, but most have been observed with limited latitudinal extent or short lifetime. In this study we analyze two large‐scale Pc1 pulsations (both latitudinally wide and long‐lasting) generated by ionospheric ducting effect using Swarm and ground magnetometers on 25 June and 3 September 2015. Swarm observed the 25 June pulsations on both dayside and nightside during the storm time substorm (a strong geomagnetic storm on 23 June with Dst =  − 204 nT). We found the Pc1 pulsations were pervasive in both magnetic local time sectors of dayside and nightside for at least 2 hr. Another large Pc1 pulsation on 3 September was observed during a nonstorm substorm period. We conclude that (1) ionospheric ducting can transmit Pc1 waves to a wide range of L shells, (2) geomagnetic storm is not a prerequisite for such large‐scale ducting, and (3) wave intensity can abruptly decrease across sharp gradients in the ionospheric plasma density.

into the Earth's atmosphere via pitch angle scattering induced by resonant wave-particle interactions. Observations of precipitating protons (>30 keV) associated with Pc1 wave were first reported by Yahnina et al. (2000) using data from the NOAA-12 satellite and the Sodankylä ground magnetometer. Yahnina et al. (2003) investigated energetic proton precipitation with/without lower energy (<20 keV) counterparts during Pc1 wave activity and showed that the type of Intervals of Pulsations with Diminishing Periods (IPDP) Pc1 waves is mostly accompanied by lower-energy proton precipitations. Miyoshi et al. (2008) first reported simultaneous observations of relativistic electron and energetic proton precipitations caused by the EMIC wave.