For the first time, we connect in series two α-MoTe2-based Schottky diodes (SDs) to form a back-to-back diode using the micromechanical exfoliation method. Such structure shows excellent performance toward chemical vapor sensing.

[177Lu]Ludotadipep, which enables targeted delivery of beta-particle radiation to prostate tumor cells, had been suggested as a promising therapeutic option for mCRPC. From November 2020 to March 2022, a total of 30 patients were enrolled for single dose of [177Lu]Ludotadipep RPT, 6 subjects in each of the 5 different activity groups of 1.9 GBq, 2.8 GBq, 3.7 GBq, 4.6 GBq, and 5.6 GBq. [177Lu]Ludotadipep was administered via venous injection, and patients were hospitalized for three days to monitor for any adverse effects. Serum PSA levels were followed up at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12, and PSMA PET/CT with [18F]Florastamin was obtained at baseline and again at weeks 4 and 8. The subjects required positive PSMA PET/CT prior to [177Lu]Ludotadipep administration. Among the 29 subjects who received [177Lu]Ludotadipep, 36 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 17 subjects (58.6%) and 4 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in 3 subjects (10.3%). Of the total 24 subjects who had full 12-week follow-up data, 16 (66.7%) showed decrease in PSA of any magnitude, and 9 (37.5%) showed a decrease in PSA by 50% or greater. A total of 5 of the 24 patients (20.8%) showed disease progression (PSA increase of 25% or higher from the baseline) at the 12th week following single dose of [177Lu]Ludotadipep. These data thus far suggest that [177Lu]Ludotadipep could be a promising RPT agent with low toxicity in mCRPC patients who have not been responsive to conventional treatments.

Background The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative factors on the recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence. Materials and methods Seventy-two patients who underwent AUS implantation between April 2006 and March 2020 were analyzed. The clinical features and preoperative urodynamic parameters were correlated with the postoperative continence rate using linear and logistic regression analysis. The recovery of continence was defined by the patient requiring no use of a protective urine pad during the 24 hours. Results Of the 72 patients, 57 (79.2%) recovered continence (dry group), while 15 (20.8%) were wearing more than 1 pad per day (wet group) on the last follow-up visit. In the clinical characteristics, only the interval between radical prostatectomy and AUS (in months) showed a statistically significant difference (35.4 ± 26.2 in the dry group, 22.7 ± 12.2 in the wet group, p = 0.009). Other preoperative clinical features such as the underlying disease, surgical methods, size of prostate, tumor stage, and radio nor hormonal therapy did not present statistically significant differences. Of the preoperative urodynamic parameters, only the abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) showed statistical significance when related to surgical outcomes by 88.6 ± 33.6 in the dry group and 66.1 ± 29.6 in wet the group (P = 0.024). The number of patients for whom ALPP was higher than 80 cm H 2 O was 61.4% in the dry group and 20% in the wet group (95% confidence interval: 1.612-25.11). Other preoperative UDS features including detrusor underactivity, maximum urethral closure pressure, and others were not statistically significant. Conclusions The interval between RP and AUS, as well as the preoperative ALPP, can be possible predictive factors for the surgical outcomes of AUS implantation. In addition, an ALPP of >80 cm H 2 O has a high degree of predictability for success of AUS surgical outcomes in post-RP incontinence.

No abstract