As a social identity anchored in a system of guiding beliefs and symbols, religion ought to serve a uniquely powerful function in shaping psychological and social processes. Religious identification offers a distinctive "sacred" worldview and "eternal" group membership, unmatched by identification with other social groups. Thus, religiosity might be explained, at least partially, by the marked cognitive and emotional value that religious group membership provides. The uniqueness of a positive social group, grounded in a belief system that offers epistemological and ontological certainty, lends religious identity a twofold advantage for the promotion of well-being. However, that uniqueness may have equally negative impacts when religious identity itself is threatened through intergroup conflict. Such consequences are illustrated by an examination of identities ranging from religious fundamentalism to atheism. Consideration of religion's dual function as a social identity and a belief system may facilitate greater understanding of the variability in its importance across individuals and groups.

Mutations of the DJ-1 (PARK7) gene are linked to familial Parkinson's disease. We used gene targeting to generate DJ-1-deficient mice that were viable, fertile, and showed no gross anatomical or neuronal abnormalities. Dopaminergic neuron numbers in the substantia nigra and fiber densities and dopamine levels in the striatum were normal. However, DJ-1؊͞؊ mice showed hypolocomotion when subjected to amphetamine challenge and increased striatal denervation and dopaminergic neuron loss induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrindine. DJ-1؊͞؊ embryonic cortical neurons showed increased sensitivity to oxidative, but not nonoxidative, insults. Restoration of DJ-1 expression to DJ-1؊͞؊ mice or cells via adenoviral vector delivery mitigated all phenotypes. WT mice that received adenoviral delivery of DJ-1 resisted 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrindine-induced striatal damage, and neurons overexpressing DJ-1 were protected from oxidative stress in vitro. Thus, DJ-1 protects against neuronal oxidative stress, and loss of DJ-1 may lead to Parkinson's disease by conferring hypersensitivity to dopaminergic insults. P arkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by tremor, rigidity, akinesia, and postural instability (1). The cause of PD remains unknown, but epidemiological and genetic studies have suggested that the observed loss of dopaminergic neurons in PD is due to defects in common intracellular signaling pathways (2). Genes linked to familial PD include ␣-synuclein (3), Parkin (4), UCH-L1 (5), PINK1 (6), and dardarin (7). Proteins encoded by these genes are thought to be involved in protein aggregation and proteasome function, processes which, when disrupted in model systems, can also result in noninherited forms of PD (8). Recently, loss-of-function mutations in the DJ-1 locus were found in families with autosomal recessive early-onset PD (9). Additional studies have confirmed other DJ-1 mutations in various PD cohorts (10). DJ-1 was initially cloned as a putative oncogene (11) and as part of an RNA-binding complex (12). DJ-1 is highly expressed by normal astrocytes (13) and has been implicated in fertilization (14) and tumorigenesis (15,16). Studies of the crystal structure of DJ-1 (17) suggest that a particular DJ-1 mutation (L166P) reduces DJ-1 protein stability (18)(19)(20), resulting in degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (21, 22). However, the physiological function of DJ-1 remains largely unknown.Motor impairments in PD patients result from inhibition of the nigrostriatal motor pathway. This inhibition is due to the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) (8). The cause of the dopaminergic neuron loss remains unknown, but oxidative stress leading to apoptotic neuronal death has been implicated (23). Various neurotoxic paradigms have been studied in an effort to reproduce oxidative stress leading to neuronal loss in the SNc. Of these, administration of the well characterized meperidine analogue 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-te...

Early-life stimulation (e.g., brief handling) attenuates the behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to stressors encountered in adulthood, particularly with respect to activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity. In contrast, if neonates were subjected to a more severe stressor, such as protracted separation from the dam or exposure to an endotoxin, then the adult response to a stressor was exaggerated. These early-life experiences program HPA functioning, including negative feedback derived from stimulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) coexpression in PVN neurons, to modify the response to subsequent stressor experiences. The persistent variations of HPA activity observed in handled/stimulated animals may stem from alterations in dam-pup interactions (e.g. increased arched-back feeding, licking, grooming). In addition genetic makeup is critical in determining stress reactivity. For instance, BALB/cByJ mice are more reactive to stressors than C57BL/6ByJ mice, exhibiting greater HPA hormonal alterations and behavioral disturbances. BALB/cByJ also fail to acquire a spatial learning response in a Morris water-maze paradigm, which has been shown to be correlated with hippocampal cell loss associated with aging. Early-life handling of BALB/cByJ mice prevented these performance deficits and attenuated the hypersecretion of ACTH and corticosterone elicited by stressors. The stressor reactivity may have been related to maternal and genetic factors. When BALB/cByJ mice were raised by a C57BL/6ByJ dam, the excessive stress-elicited HPA activity was reduced, as were the behavioral impairments. However, cross-fostering the more resilient C57BL/6ByJ mice to a BALB/cByJ dam failed to elicit the behavioral disturbances. It is suggested that genetic factors may influence dam-pup interactive styles and may thus proactively influence the response to subsequent stressors among vulnerable animals. In contrast, in relatively hardy animals the early-life manipulations may have less obvious effects.

No abstract