Stable isotope labeling is widely used to encode and quantify proteins in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. We compared metabolic labeling with stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and chemical labeling by stable isotope dimethyl labeling and find that they have comparable accuracy and quantitative dynamic range in unfractionated proteome analyses and affinity pull-down experiments. Analyzing SILAC- and dimethyl-labeled samples together in single liquid chromatography–mass spectrometric analyses minimizes differences under analytical conditions, allowing comparisons of quantitative errors introduced during sample processing. We find that SILAC is more reproducible than dimethyl labeling. Because proteins from metabolically labeled populations can be combined before proteolytic digestion, SILAC is particularly suited to studies with extensive sample processing, such as fractionation and enrichment of peptides with post-translational modifications. We compared both methods in pull-down experiments using a kinase inhibitor, dasatinib, and tagged GRB2-SH2 protein as affinity baits. We describe a StageTip dimethyl-labeling protocol that we applied to in-solution and in-gel protein digests. Comparing the impact of post-digest isotopic labeling on quantitative accuracy, we demonstrate how specific experimental designs can benefit most from metabolic labeling approaches like SILAC and situations where chemical labeling by stable isotope-dimethyl labeling can be a practical alternative.

ATP-competitive protein kinase inhibitors are important research tools and therapeutic agents. Because there are >500 human kinases that contain highly conserved active sites, the development of selective inhibitors is extremely challenging. Methods to rapidly and efficiently profile kinase inhibitor targets in cell lysates are urgently needed to discover selective compounds and to elucidate the mechanisms of action for polypharmacological inhibitors. Here, we describe a protocol for microgram-scale chemoproteomic profiling of ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors using kinobeads. We employed a gel-free in situ digestion protocol coupled to nanoflow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to profile ~200 kinases in single analytical runs using as little as 5 μl of kinobeads and 300 μg of protein. With our kinobead reagents, we obtained broad coverage of the kinome, monitoring the relative expression levels of 312 kinases in a diverse panel of 11 cancer cell lines. Further, we profiled a set of pyrrolopyrimidine- and pyrazolopyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors in competition-binding experiments with label-free quantification, leading to the discovery of a novel selective and potent inhibitor of protein kinase D (PKD) 1, 2 and 3. Our protocol is useful for rapid and sensitive profiling of kinase expression levels and ATP-competitive kinase inhibitor selectivity in native proteomes.

Many cellular processes are modulated by cyclic AMP and nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) regulate this second messenger by catalyzing its breakdown. The major unique function of testicular Leydig cells is to produce testosterone in response to luteinizing hormone (LH). Treatment of Leydig cells with PDE inhibitors increase cAMP levels and the activity of its downstream effector, cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), leading to a series of kinase-dependent signaling and transcription events that ultimately increase testosterone release. We have recently shown that PDE4B, PDE8A and PDE8B are highly expressed in rodent Leydig and adrenocortical cells and that combined inhibition of PDE4 and PDE8 lead to dramatically increased steroid biosynthesis. Here we investigated and the effect of PDE4 and PDE8 inhibitions on the molecular mechanisms of cAMP in a mouse MA10 Leydig cell line model with SILAC mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics. We treated MA10 cells either with PDE family specific PDE4 inhibitor (Rolipram) and PDE8 family specific inhibitor (PF-04957325) alone or in combination and quantified the resulting phosphorylation changes at five different time points between 0 and 180 minutes. We identified 28,336 phosphosites from 4837 proteins and observed significant regulation of 749 sites in response to PDE4 and PDE8 inhibitor treatment. Of these, 132 phosphosites were consensus PKA sites. Our data strongly suggest that PDE4 and PDE8 inhibitors synergistically regulate phosphorylation of proteins required for many different cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, lipid and glucose metabolism, transcription, endocytosis and vesicle transport. Our data suggests cAMP, PDE4 and PDE8 coordinate regulation of steroidogenesis by acting on not one rate-limiting step but rather multiple pathways. Moreover, the pools of cAMP controlled by these PDEs also coordinate many other metabolic processes that must be regulated to assure timely and sufficient testosterone secretion in response to LH.