Sirtuin 2 (Sirt2) is known to negatively regulate anoxia‐reoxygenation injury in myoblasts. Because protein levels of Sirt2 are increased in ischemia‐reperfusion (I/R)‐injured liver tissues, we examined whether Sirt2 is protective or detrimental against hepatic I/R injury. We overexpressed Sirt2 in the liver of C57BL/6 mice using a Sirt2 adenovirus. Wild‐type and Sirt2 knockout mice were subjected to a partial (70%) hepatic ischemia for 45 minutes, followed by various periods of reperfusion. In another set of experiments, wild‐type mice were pretreated intraperitoneally with AGK2, a Sirt2 inhibitor. Isolated hepatocytes and Kupffer cells from wild‐type and Sirt2 knockout mice were subjected to hypoxia‐reoxygenation injury to determine the in vitro effects of Sirt2. Mice subjected to I/R injury showed typical patterns of hepatocellular damage. Prior injection with Sirt2 adenovirus aggravated liver injury, as demonstrated by increases in serum aminotransferases, prothrombin time, proinflammatory cytokines, hepatocellular necrosis and apoptosis, and neutrophil infiltration relative to control virus‐injected mice. Pretreatment with AGK2 resulted in significant improvements in serum aminotransferase levels and histopathologic findings. Similarly, experiments with Sirt2 knockout mice also revealed reduced hepatocellular injury. The molecular mechanism of Sirt2's involvement in this aggravation of hepatic I/R injury includes the deacetylation and inhibition of mitogen‐activated protein kinase phosphatase‐1 and consequent activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinases. Conclusion: Sirt2 is an aggravating factor during hepatic I/R injury. (Hepatology 2017;65:225‐236).

BackgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR.MethodsAll patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images.ResultsA total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81 mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15 mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being.ConclusionPreserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life.

Background: Kidney transplantation (KT) is regarded as the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. The annual number of KT cases in South Korea has increased rapidly as more centers are implementing a transplantation program. The objective of this study was to determine clinical outcomes of the first 300 consecutive cases of KT in a single center. Methods: Clinical data of 300 cases of KT at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from January 2004 to March 2018 were obtained from a prospectively collected database and retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.7±12.9 years, and 59% of patients were male. There were 225 living donors and 75 deceased donors. A total of 42 cases were from ABO-incompatible donors. During a mean follow-up of 68.6±43.5 months, 38 patients (12.7%) experienced rejection. The most common cause was acute T-cell mediated rejection (9.0%). Eighteen patients experienced graft loss. One-year and 5-year death-censored graft survival rates were 99% and 96.6%, respectively. One-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 98.3% and 96.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio and rejection were significant factors affecting graft survival. Conclusions: This single-center review demonstrates clinical outcomes comparable to other major centers. Such good outcomes were obtained by good patient selection, dedicated transplant physicians, and adequate use of immunosuppressive therapy.

Backgrounds: The ACOSOG Z0011 trial revealed oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) and sentinel lymph node biopsy only versus completion axillary dissection to be equivalent. It was also reported that axillary recurrence rate to be not different between axillary dissection group and SLNB only group, despite the positive rate of over 20% in non-sentinel lymph nodes. It led to suspicion that the role of SLNB in local control to be less significant than previously recognized. Currently trials such as SOUND trial and NAUTILUS trial are being conducted in cT1N0 breast cancer undergoing BCS to compare the outcomes between the current standard surgery and no axillary surgery. Purposes: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with positive SLN in patients with T1 breast cancer, including T substages. We also evaluated the oncologic outcomes according to SLN positivity. Method: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with pT1 breast cancer who underwent BCS including SLNB at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2010 to 2015 (n=986). SLN positive was defined as one or more micro- to macro-metastasis in axillary lymph node specimen. Overall, regional, and systemic recurrence-free survival (RFS, RRFS, SRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Result: Of 986 patients, positive SLN was observed in 116 patients (11.8%). Regarding T substages, T1mic, T1a, and T1b gouprs showed SLN positive rate of 0%, 3.4%, and 8.5% respectively whereas T1c showed 15.3%. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed clinical T stage (OR 1.791, 95% CI 1.061-3.023, P=0.029), >C2 finding in preoperative axillary ultrasonograpy (OR 3.021, 95% CI 1.740-5.248, P< 0.001), usual histologic type including invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinoma confirmed in preoperative biopsy (OR 4.406, 95% CI 1.357-14.305, P=0.014) to be independent predictive factors for SLN positivity. The median follow-up period was 103.03 months. The 5 year RFS, RRFS, SRFS, and OS showed no statistical difference between SLN positive group and negative group. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, serum CEA level higher than 5ng/ml at diagnosis (HR 7.534, 95% CI 3.336-17.019, P=0.002) and Ki-67 level higher than 20% (HR 7.534, 95% CI 3.336-17.019, P< 0.001) were shown to be the independent prognostic factors for RFS. Conclusion: Our data implicates that patients with T1c breast cancer should undergo SLNB at all times presently, considering substantially higher SLN positive rate compared to other T1 substages (16.8% vs. 6.1%, P< 0.001) although no survival difference was observed between SLN positive group and negative group. Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrence-free survival and overall survival Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrence-free survival and overall survival Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no difference of recurrence-free survival, overall survival between SLN-positive and SLN-negative group. Univariable and multivariable model for recurrence-free survival Higher Ki-67 expression, ER negativity, PR negativity, HER2 positivity were shown to be independent risk factors associated with shorter RFS. Multivariable analysis showed higher Ki-67 expression as the sole independent risk factor for shorter RFS. Citation Format: Hyoung Won Koh, Hee-Chul Shin, Eun-Kyu Kim, Eunyoung Kang. Positive sentinel lymph node does not affect prognosis in T1 breast cancer patients who undergo breast conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-32.

Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has significantly impacted the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Our study investigated the change in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer with the progress of COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and Methods The study group comprised 6,514 recently diagnosed breast cancer patients between January 1, 2019, and February 28, 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: pre–COVID-19 period (3,182; January 2019 to December 2019) and COVID-19 pandemic period (3,332; January 2020 to February 2021). Clinicopathological information related to the first treatment after breast cancer diagnosis was retrospectively collected and analyzed in the two groups.Results Among the 6,514 breast cancer patients, 3,182 were in the pre–COVID-19 period and 3,332 were in the COVID-19 pandemic period. According to our evaluation, the least breast cancer diagnosis (21.8%) was seen in the first quarter of 2020. The diagnosis increased gradually except for the fourth quarter in 2020. While early-stage breast cancer was diagnosed 1,601 (48.1%) during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.001), the number of surgical treatments increased 4.6% (p < 0.001), and the treatment time was slightly shorter 2 days (p=0.001). The breast cancer subtype distribution was not statistically different between the pre–COVID-19 and COVID-19 period groups.Conclusion In the early stages of the pandemic, the number of breast cancer cases temporarily decreased; however, they stabilized soon, and no significant differences could be identified in the diagnosis and treatment when compared to the period before the pandemic.