Background Although several factors exacerbate osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), little is known about whether pelvic sagittal parameters are associated with a greater risk of ONFH progression. Questions/purposes The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic sagittal parameters and disease progression (collapse of the femoral head) in patients with nontraumatic ONFH. Methods From March 2010 through December 2016, we saw 401 patients with unilateral ONFH diagnosed at an outpatient clinic using plain radiography and MRI that were retrospectively reviewed. Of those, 276 patients met our inclusion criteria: Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) Stage I or II nontraumatic unilateral ONFH without femoral head collapse, older than 18 years, and no prior surgical treatment. In all, 74% (203 of 276) of hips had complete follow-up (clinical and radiographic) at a minimum of 2 years. The pelvic sagittal parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope) of all patients were measured with standing radiographs by two observers. Progression of disease and potential collapse of the femoral head of all patients (ARCO Stage ≥ III) was examined using radiography every 2 to 3 months after the first outpatient clinic visit. If patients with intractable pain associated with collapse of the femoral head did not respond to nonoperative treatment, THA was performed during the follow-up period. The patients were divided into two groups for comparison: those whose femoral head collapsed within 12 months (rapid progression group) and those whose femoral head did not collapse (nonrapid progression group). The rapid progression group consisted of 49 men and 55 women with a mean age of 55 years; the nonrapid progression group consisted of 60 men and 39 women with a mean age of 56 years. Factors such as age, sex, BMI, size of necrotic lesions, location of necrosis, necrosis risk factor associated with the rapid progression of disease were analyzed using an exploratory univariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis. Results Pelvic incidence (53° ± 9° versus 49° ± 7°; p < 0.01) and sacral slope (38° ± 9° versus 33° ± 7°; p < 0.01) were greater in the rapid progression group than in the non-rapid progression group. After accounting for potentially confounding variables like age, sex, BMI, size of necrotic lesions, location of necrosis, and necrosis risk factors, the only variable we found that was independently associated with more rapid disease progression was high (> 55°) pelvic incidence (odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI 0.91 to 0.99]; p = 0.03). Conclusions After controlling for potential confounders such as age, sex, BMI, size of necrotic lesions, location of necrosis, and necrosis risk factors, we found that a high pelvic incidence was associated with a greater likelihood of femoral head collapse in patients with nontraumatic ONFH. Assessing pelvic sagittal parameters in patients with early nontraumatic ONFH may help anticipate which patients are at risk for femoral head collapse, but future prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to those of conventional UKA in Asian patients.MethodsFifty-five patients underwent robot-assisted UKA and 57 patients underwent conventional UKA were assessed in this study. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), American Knee Society (AKS) score, Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC), and patellofemoral (PF) score values were compared between the two groups. The mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) and Kennedy zone were also measured. Coronal alignments of the femoral and tibial components and posterior slopes of the tibial component were compared. Additionally, polyethylene (PE) liner thicknesses were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups regarding postoperative ROM, AKS, WOMAC and PF score. Robot group showed fewer radiologic outliers in terms of mFTA and coronal alignment of tibial and femoral components (p = 0.022, 0.037, 0.003). The two groups showed significantly different PE liner thicknesses (8.4 ± 0.8 versus 8.8 ± 0.9, p = 0.035). Robot group was the only influencing factor for reducing radiologic outlier (postoperative mFTA) in multivariate model (odds ratio: 2.833, p = 0.037).ConclusionIn this study, robot-assisted UKA had many advantages over conventional UKA, such as its ability to achieve precise implant insertion and reduce radiologic outliers. Although the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted UKA over a short-term follow-up period were not significantly different compared to those of conventional UKA, longer follow-up period is needed to determine whether the improved radiologic accuracy of the components in robotic-assisted UKA will lead to better clinical outcomes and improved long-term survival.

Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate the biomechanical effects of the deficiency of the collateral ligament and cruciate ligament in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in normal and varus knee patients using computational simulation. Methods Validated finite‐element (FE) models for conditions of various cruciate and collateral ligament deficiencies were developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of ligamentous deficiency in UKA for normal and varus knee patients. Contact stresses on the polyethylene (PE) insert, contact stresses on the lateral articular cartilage, and quadriceps force were analyzed under gait‐loading conditions. Results Contact stresses on the PE insert and lateral articular cartilage as well as quadriceps force in a normal knee UKA FE model were increased in the order of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, medial collateral ligament (MCL) deficiency, lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency in the stance phase of gait cycle, as compared with those in the model without ligamentous deficiency. In two or more multiple ligamentous deficiencies, contact stresses on the PE insert and articular lateral cartilage and quadriceps force were significantly increased versus in the case of single‐ligament deficiency. Conclusion Poor outcomes of medial UKA in patients with ACL or MCL deficiency can be predicted. Care should be taken to extend the indications when performing medial UKA in patients with ligamentous deficiency, especially when varus knee with ACL or MCL deficiency is present.

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate stress shielding of anatomical tibial components (ATCs) in comparison to conventional symmetric tibial components (STCs) in Korean patients which may be related to medial tibial bone loss. Method78 knees in 59 patients with ATCs (Persona™) and 74 knees in 58 patients with STCs (NexGen LPS‐Flex™) were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes in both groups were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for medial tibial bone loss. ResultsMedial tibial bone loss was significantly greater in the ATC group (1.6 ± 1.3 mm) than in the STC group (0.4 ± 0.8 mm) (p < 0.001). The ATC group showed a shorter distance between the distal metal tip and anteromedial cortex and higher invading into the sclerotic bone lesion (ISBL) than the STC group (p = 0.034 and p = 0.044, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis suggested ATC, a shorter distance to the anteromedial cortex, and the presence of ISBL as risk factors for medial tibial bone loss. The odds ratios of medial tibial bone loss according to type of prosthesis, distance to anteromedial cortex, and presence of ISBL were 6.25 (range 2.86–13.63, p < 0.001), 0.69 (range 0.51–0.93, p = 0.015), and 3.79 (range 1.56–9.21, p = 0.003), respectively. Notwithstanding, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. ConclusionIn Korean patients, ATCs potentially causes greater medial tibial bone loss due to stress shielding than STCs. The design, however, does not yet appear to affect clinical outcomes at mid‐term follow‐up. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, level III.