BackgroundIntraosseous lipoma is a very rare lesion that constitutes no more than 0.1% of all bone tumors. We analyzed 21 cases of intraosseous lipoma at a single institution for clinical and radiographic characteristics.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on 21 pathologically confirmed intraosseous lipomas treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2017. Simple X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging findings and medical records were reviewed. Patients' age, sex, and clinical symptoms were investigated. From the radiographic images, the site of the lesion, calcification, bony expansion, and stage of the lesion were evaluated. Correlations between the degree of involution and clinical symptoms were analyzed.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 50 years (range, 20 to 67 years), and there were 13 males and eight females. The mean lesion size was 6.1 cm (range, 2.5 to 13.6 cm). The most common anatomical site of the lesion was the femur (seven cases), and three cases occurred in flat bones such as the ilium and scapula. Visual analogue scale score for pain was 3 to 6 in 15 patients. There were no complaints of functional limitation. There was no correlation between the degree of degeneration and clinical symptoms (p = 1.000). Curettage was performed as a surgical treatment in 20 patients, and bone graft was performed using a bone chip. Excision was performed in one patient. Pain was resolved in seven of 11 patients with a complaint of preoperative pain; intermittent pain remained in four cases. There was no local recurrence or malignant change during the follow-up.ConclusionsThere was no correlation between the degree of degeneration and clinical symptoms. Pain was the most common clinical symptom, but it was rarely accompanied by functional limitation. However, it is important to distinguish it from other pain-inducing disorders. The incidence of intraosseous lipomas is low, and detection based on various imaging findings can be difficult. Clear understanding of the radiographic findings and symptoms of intraosseous lipoma is helpful for diagnosis and differentiation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the choice of appropriate surgical procedure through follow-up of postoperative results in patients with radiation-induced osteonecrosis of the hip. Materials and methods: From January 1990 to December 2010, 25 patients underwent surgery for hip osteonecrosis after pelvic irradiation, for a total of 31 cases. The mean patient age was 61.6 years and the mean follow-up period was 60.4 months. There were 28 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty, three cases of primary resection arthroplasty, and six cases of secondary resection arthroplasty after total hip arthroplasty failure. The THA group was classified into two groups according to the period of operation: 1990 $ 2000 and 2001 $ 2010. THA and resection arthroplasty were compared retrospectively. Results: In the 16 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty (1990 $ 2000), 8 cases (50%) had a failed acetabular component. In 12 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty (2001 $ 2010), two cases (16.7%) had a failed acetabular component and two cases (16.7%) had an infection. Six cases underwent resection arthroplasty after total hip arthroplasty. There were no complications in the nine cases of resection arthroplasty. Seven of the nine cases (77.7%) had pain relief. The mean VAS scores of the resection arthroplasty group were lower than those of the total hip arthroplasty group at the time of the latest follow up (P = 0.04). Conclusions: The failure rate of total hip arthroplasty used in radiation necrosis has decreased. Therefore, total hip arthroplasty should be the primary surgical method in patients with radiation-induced osteonecrosis of the hip. Resection arthroplasty is limited as first-line therapy due to functional problems. It use should be limited to pain control in low-demand elderly patients.

No abstract