Both systems were safe and effective in microcoaxial phacoemulsification. The 1.8 mm system performed better with cortical-type cataract and the 2.2 mm system, with high-density nuclear-type cataract.

The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of total corneal power calculation from a swept-source optical coherence tomography–based biometer and a rotating Scheimpflug tomographer for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix toric TFNT intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Labroatories, Inc). METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken on 145 eyes implanted with the TFNT IOL. The accuracy of total corneal power calculation from a SS-OCT–based biometer (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG; total keratometry [TK]) and a rotating Scheimpflug tomographer (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH; total corneal refractive power at 3 mm [TCRP3] and at 4 mm [TCRP4]) were compared. The surgically induced astigmatism vector, difference vector, angle of vector, correction index, index of success, coefficient of adjustment, and flattening index were analyzed using the VectrAK analysis program (ASSORT). RESULTS: The index of success showed a significant difference between the three methods ( P = .035, analysis of variance test). The mean ± standard deviation of the index of success was the best in TK (0.43 ± 0.20), followed by TCRP4 (0.47 ± 0.24, P = .400, Bonferroni HSD test) and TCRP3 (0.50 ± 0.22, P = .030, Bonferroni HSD test). The preoperative refractive astigmatism prediction error was within ±0.50 diopters (D) in 62 eyes (42.8%) when using TCRP4 and in 66 eyes (45.5%) when using TK. CONCLUSIONS: These study results suggest that the refractive accuracy of TFNT implantation using total corneal power from TCRP4 and TK was favorable. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(10):686–692.]

Purpose To report clinical outcomes of a four-flanged intrascleral fixation technique using toric and multifocal intraocular lens. Observations We describe two cases of premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after which the patients fully recovered their visual function following a four-point sutureless scleral fixation technique via a 2.8-mm corneal incision. In the first case, a monofocal toric hydrophobic lens consisting of two haptic plates with four holes for suturing was fixated with 5–0 polypropylene monofilament. In the second case, a bifocal hydrophobic lens with the same haptic design was fixated. No conjunctival or scleral sutures, glue, or flap formation was required during the surgery. There were no complications related to the surgical process. Conclusions and Importance A four-flanged intrascleral fixation technique may benefit patients with poor zonular support who have high expectations for postoperative visual quality.

No abstract