Screening for variants in TPMT did not reduce the proportions of patients with hematologic ADRs during thiopurine treatment for IBD. However, there was a 10-fold reduction in hematologic ADRs among variant carriers who were identified and received a dose reduction, compared with variant carriers who did not, without differences in treatment efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00521950.

Main recommendationsESGE recommends the “pull” technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer (“push”) technique for PEG placement in cases where the “pull” method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed “blindly” at the patient’s bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 – 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 – 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Main recommendationsESGE recommends considering the following indications for enteral tube insertion: (i) clinical conditions that make oral intake impossible (neurological conditions, obstructive causes); (ii) acute and/or chronic diseases that result in a catabolic state where oral intake becomes insufficient; and (iii) chronic small-bowel obstruction requiring a decompression gastrostomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of temporary feeding tubes placed through a natural orifice (either nostril) in patients expected to require enteral nutrition (EN) for less than 4 weeks. If it is anticipated that EN will be required for more than 4 weeks, percutaneous access should be considered, depending on the clinical setting.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the gastric route as the primary option in patients in need of EN support. Only in patients with altered/unfavorable gastric anatomy (e. g. after previous surgery), impaired gastric emptying, intolerance to gastric feeding, or with a high risk of aspiration, should the jejunal route be chosen.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE suggests that recent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to peptic ulcer disease with risk of rebleeding should be considered to be a relative contraindication to percutaneous enteral access procedures, as should hemodynamic or respiratory instability.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE suggests that the presence of ascites and ventriculoperitoneal shunts should be considered to be additional risk factors for infection and, therefore, further preventive precautions must be taken in these cases.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that percutaneous tube placement (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG], percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension [PEG-J], or direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy [D-PEJ]) should be considered to be a procedure with high hemorrhagic risk, and that in order to reduce this risk, specific guidelines for antiplatelet or anticoagulant use should be followed strictly.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with advanced dementia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with a life expectancy shorter than 30 days.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence*.

Gastric MALT lymphoma is a distinct entity related to Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Some studies suggest a role for trisomy 3 in the genesis of these lymphomas, but they mainly focused on low-grade MALT lymphoma. Gastric MALT lymphoma, however, comprises a spectrum from low-to high-grade cases. Furthermore, its exact relation to primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the stomach is not clear. We applied in situ hybridisation (ISH) with centromeric probes on 43 samples of 39 patients with primary gastric lymphoma (13 samples with low-grade MALT lymphoma, 25 with high-grade MALT lymphoma and five with DLBCL) to detect numerical aberrations of 10 chromosomes. ISH was performed immunohistochemically on nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded resection tissue and on whole paraffin sections using immunofluorescence. In six of 13 low-grade MALT lymphomas trisomy was detected (46%) and mostly involved chromosome 3 (33%). In high-grade MALT lymphomas, trisomies were found in 16 of 25 cases (64%), mainly involving chromosomes 12 and 18. Trisomy 3 was present in only 13% of these cases. Of five DLBCL, only one showed trisomy. Nine of the 16 aberrant high-grade MALT lymphomas (56%) showed trisomy of more than one chromosome per case vs two of six for low-grade cases. In lymphomas with separate low-and high-grade tumour components some trisomies were detected in both components, whereas others occurred only in the high-grade tumour cells. This supports the hypothesis that high-grade MALT lymphomas can develop from a low-grade type and that this progression is accompanied by the acquisition of more genetic aberrations. However, trisomy 3 probably does not play a major role in this progression.

To elucidate the role of cell turnover in primary gastric B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas we studied tissue samples of 72 patients-26 small cell (25 MALT lymphomas) and 46 large cell (31 MALT lymphomas). Proliferation indices and apoptotic indices were measured by Mib-1 expression and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TdT)-mediated nick end labelling, respectively. Furthermore, expression of the apoptosis related gene-products bcl-2 and p53 was studied. Large cell lymphomas showed significantly higher proliferation indices (59.1% vs. 15.4%) and apoptotic indices (3.2% vs.0.7%) than small cell lymphomas. Proliferation and apoptotic indices were positively correlated (r = 0.371, P = 0.03). Expression of the bcl-2 protein was significantly higher in the small cell lymphomas. Furthermore, cases with a high bcl-2 expression showed both a significantly decreased proliferation (P < 0.0001) and apoptotic index (P = 0.0096) compared to bcl-2 negative cases. Expression of the mutant p53 protein was present in 8.0% of small cell and in 18.2% of large cell lymphomas. p53 positive cases showed significantly higher proliferation indices, but showed no correlation with apoptotic index. These data suggest that impaired apoptosis by bcl-2 may be more prominent than proliferation in the genesis of small cell lymphomas, whereas a high cell turnover characterizes large cell primary gastric lymphomas.