Construction, demolition, and renovation activities generate a significant amount of waste, posing serious environmental risks. The scarcity of recycling facilities makes it difficult to implement the new legislation, which calls for producing recycled aggregates. Moreover, the lack of studies on the environmental feasibility of recycling construction and demolition waste in regions with plentiful natural resources of aggregates is a contributing factor to this scarcity. Therefore, this paper studies the environmental feasibility of establishing a construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling plant. A case study approach compares the CDW recycling process against the traditional quarrying process for generating aggregates. The lifecycle assessment method is used for evaluating both scenarios. Contribution analysis is performed to infer the factors influencing the viability of the recycling process. Thereafter, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the suitability of the proposed location for the recycling facility. As revealed by the single score, the recycling alternative has a 23% more negative environmental impact than quarrying. Nevertheless, there is a chance that the recycling process could be environmentally advantageous. Findings indicated that a total travel distance of 70 km between the demolition site and the construction site is recommended to guarantee environmental feasibility. The transportation distance is found to be the most critical element influencing the environmental feasibility of recycling CDW. The findings of this study help the decision-makers in environmental affairs to consider the influencing factors when constructing a CDW recycling plant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.