The paper presents the investigations of high power plasma interaction with material surfaces under conditions simulating the ITER disruptions and type I ELMs. Different materials were exposed to plasma with repetitive pulses of 250 µs duration, the ion energy of up to 0.6 keV, and the heat loads varying in the 0.5-25 MJ m −2 range. The plasma energy transfer to the material surface versus impact load has been analysed. The fraction of plasma energy that is absorbed by the target surface is rapidly decreased with the achievement of the evaporation onset for exposed targets. The distributions of evaporated material in front of the target surface and the thickness of the shielding layer are found to be strongly dependent on the target atomic mass. The surface analysis of tungsten targets exposed to quasi-steady-state plasma accelerators plasma streams is presented together with measurements of the melting onset load and evaporation threshold, and also of erosion patterns with increasing heat load and the number of plasma pulses.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The features of plasma energy transfer to material surfaces during plasma–surface interactions (PSIs) in the presence of a strong magnetic field are investigated within the recently developed quasi-stationary plasma accelerator, QSPA-M. This novel PSI test-bed facility can reproduce edge localized mode (ELM) impacts, both in terms of heat load and particle flux to the surface, and provide plasma transportation in an external magnetic field, which mimics the divertor conditions. Investigations of energy transfer to the material surface have been performed for varied plasma heat load and external magnetic field values. Calorimetry, optical emission spectroscopy and high-speed imaging were applied for PSI characterization. For perpendicular plasma incidence, it has been shown that the transient plasma layer is formed in front of the surface by the stopped head of the plasma stream even for rather small plasma heat loads, which do not result in surface melting. The plasma density in this near-surface layer is much higher than in the impacting stream. It leads to the arisen screening effect for energy transfer to the surface. For B  =  0, the thickness of the screening layer is less than 3 cm, but it increases to 15 cm when B  =  0.8 T. The shielding effect due to the formation of a dense plasma layer in front of the exposed surface should be favorable for material performance, being important for decreasing the overall erosion of plasma-facing components during a large number of repetitive ELMs.