This paper presents a statistical analysis of the circumgalactic environment of nearby Seyfert galaxies based on a computer-aided search of companion galaxies on the Digitized Sky Survey (DSS). We defined a sample of 72 nearby Seyfert 1 (redshift 0.007 ≤ z ≤ 0.034) and a sample of 60 Seyfert 2 galaxies (0.007 ≤ z≤ 0.020), which include only high galactic latitude objects. In addition, we built two control samples of non-active galaxies matching the number of sample members, the redshift, morphological type, and diameter distribution of the Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 samples separately. We stress how our sample selection introduces important methodological improvements that avoid several sources of strong bias. An intrinsic difference between the environment of Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 galaxies, suggested by previous work, is confirmed as statistically significant. For Seyfert 2 galaxies we find a significant excess of large companions (D C > ∼ 10 Kpc) within a search radius < ∼ 100 Kpc of projected linear distance, as well as within a search radius equal to three times the diameter D S of each Seyfert galaxy. For Seyfert 1 galaxies there is no clear evidence of any excess of companion galaxies neither within 100 Kpc, nor within 3D S . For all samples the number of companions actually counted within a search radius of 3 D S is a factor ≈ 2 above the expectation values derived from the number density of galaxies over one square degree fields centered on the sample galaxies, suggesting a markedly non-Poissonian distribution for galaxies on scales < ∼ 100 Kpc. This difference in environment is not compatible with the simplest formulation of the Unification Model (UM) for Seyferts: both types 1 and 2 should be intrinsicaly alike, the only difference being due to orientation of an obscuring torus. We propose an alternative formulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.