SummarySoil phosphates exchange oxygen atoms rapidly with soil water once recycled by intracellular enzymes, thereby approaching an equilibrium 18 O P signature that depends on ambient temperature and the 18 O W signature of soil water. We hypothesized that in the topsoil, phosphates reach this equilibrium 18 O P signature even if amended by different fertilizers. In the subsoil, however, there might be phosphates with a smaller 18 O P value than that represented by the isotopic equilibrium value, a condition that could exist in the case of limited biological P cycling only. We tested these hypotheses for the HCl-extractable P pool of the Hedley fractionation scheme of arable soil in Germany, which integrates over extended time-scales of the soil P cycle. We sampled several types of fertilizer, the surface soil that received these fertilizer types and composites from a Haplic Luvisol depth profile under long-term agricultural practice. Organic fertilizers had significantly smaller 18 O P values than mineral fertilizers. Intriguingly, the fields fertilized organically also tended to have smaller 18 O P signatures than other types of surface soil, which calls into question full isotopic equilibrium at all sites. At depths below 50 cm, the soil 18 O P values were even depleted relative to the values calculated for isotopic equilibrium. This implies that HCl-extractable phosphates in different soil horizons are of different origins. In addition, it supports the assumption that biological cycling of P by intracellular microbial enzymes might have been relatively inefficient in the deeper subsoil. At depths of 50-80 cm, there was a transition zone of declining 18 O P values, which might be regarded as the first evidence that the degree of biological P cycling changed at this depth interval.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.