Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy are essential. This update and revision of the global guideline for HAE provides up-to-date consensus recommendations for the management of HAE. In the development of this update and revision of the guideline, an international expert panel reviewed the existing evidence and developed 20 recommendations that were discussed, finalized and consented during the guideline consensus conference in June 2016 in Vienna. The final version of this update and revision of the guideline incorporates the contributions of a board of expert reviewers and the endorsing societies. The goal of this guideline update and revision is to provide clinicians and their patients with guidance that will assist them in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2). The key clinical questions covered by these recommendations are: 1) How should HAE-1/2 be defined and classified?, 2) How should HAE-1/2 be diagnosed?, 3) Should HAE-1/2 patients receive prophylactic and/or on-demand treatment and what treatment options should be used?, 4) Should HAE-1/2 management be different for special HAE-1/2 patient groups such as pregnant/lactating women or children?, and 5) Should HAE-1/2 management incorporate self-administration of therapies and patient support measures? This article is co-published with permission in Allergy and the World Allergy Organization Journal.

No abstract

BackgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE), caused by deficiency in C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), leads to unpredictable edema of subcutaneous tissues with potentially fatal complications. As surgery can be a trigger for edema episodes, current guidelines recommend preoperative prophylaxis with C1-INH or attenuated androgens in patients with HAE undergoing surgery. However, the risk of an HAE attack in patients without prophylaxis has not been quantified.ObjectivesThis analysis examined rates of perioperative edema in patients with HAE not receiving prophylaxis.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of records of randomly selected patients with HAE type I or II treated at the Frankfurt Comprehensive Care Centre. These were examined for information about surgical procedures and the presence of perioperative angioedema.ResultsA total of 331 patients were included; 247 underwent 700 invasive procedures. Of these procedures, 335 were conducted in 144 patients who had not received prophylaxis at the time of surgery. Categories representing significant numbers of procedures were abdominal (n = 113), ENT (n = 71), and gynecological (n = 58) procedures. The rate of documented angioedema without prophylaxis across all procedures was 5.7%; in 24.8% of procedures, the presence of perioperative angioedema could not be excluded, leading to a maximum potential risk of 30.5%. Predictors of perioperative angioedema could not be identified.ConclusionThe risk of perioperative angioedema in patients with HAE type I or II without prophylaxis undergoing surgical procedures ranged from 5.7% to 30.5% (CI 3.5–35.7%). The unpredictability of HAE episodes supports current international treatment recommendations to consider short-term prophylaxis for all HAE patients undergoing surgery.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is becoming much more genetically complex than was initially considered. Thus, the role of HAE genetics is expanding beyond research laboratories and the genotyping of subjects suffering from HAE has become diagnostically indispensable in clinical practice. The synthesis and interpretation of the clinical and biochemical analyses to facilitate appropriate genetic test selection has thus also become significantly more complex. With this in mind, an international multidisciplinary group of 13 experts in HAE genetics and disease management was convened in October 2018. The objective was to develop clear, actionable, evidence-and consensus-based statements aiming to facilitate the communication between physicians treating HAE patients and clinical geneticists, and thus promote the effective use of genetics in the management of the disease. Eleven consensus statements were generated, encompassing considerations regarding the clinical indications for genotyping angioedema patients, the methods of detection of HAE causative variants, the variant pathogenicity curation, the genotyping of HAE patients in the clinic, and genetic counseling. These statements are intended both to guide clinicians and to serve as a framework for future educational and further genetic testing developments as the field continues to evolve rapidly.

In order to assess inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe (factor VIII [FVIII]<1%) and moderate (FVIII 1 to 5%) hemophilia A, a prospective study was initiated in 1976. During the 23-year study period, 72 hemophiliacs were frequently exposed prophylactically or on demand to plasma-derived (pd) (n = 51) or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) (n = 21) concentrates (median 270 exposure days [ED]). Inhibitor testing was performed before the first exposure and at regular intervals thereafter. Of the 72 hemophilia A patients, 22 (32%) developed an inhibitor after 15 ED in median (range 4 to 195); 17 (77%) were high responders (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]), and the remaining 5 patients (23%) were low responders (>0.6 to 5 BU). The severely affected patients (n = 46) showed a significantly higher frequency of inhibitor formation (43%) than did the moderate ones (8%). Comparing the severely affected patients receiving pd products exclusively (n = 35) with those treated with recombinant concentrate (n = 11), 37% of the pd group developed a high-titer inhibitor (>5 BU, median 290 ED in noninhibitor patients) and 36% of the recombinant group (median 49 ED in the noninhibitor patients). However, the exposure status of the recombinant noninhibitor patients is rather low and therefore remains a high risk of developing further inhibitors in the future. The mutation type profile revealed no difference between the pd- and the recombinant-treated patients.