No abstract

Keeping cattle inside on concrete slatted floors can be detrimental to their health and behaviour and is also costly. Therefore, 22 steers of the Swedish Red and White Dairy breed were used to investigate the effect of wintering outdoors on growing cattle. The steers had a mean weight of 310 kg at the onset of the study. During winter, 11 ‘indoor’ steers were housed in pens with concrete slatted floors and 11 ‘outdoor’ steers were kept in a field with access to a shelter and trees. From the end of April until slaughter in September, both groups grazed together. During winter, all steers were given clover silage ad libitum. They were weighed every month. The behaviour of the outdoor steers was recorded from November to the end of March. Outdoor temperature, wind speed and solar radiation were measured continuously. A heated model was used in order to calculate the climatic energy demand. The steers were never observed to shiver. They were not observed to use the shelter during daytime. The most frequently observed behaviour was ‘eating’, followed by ‘standing’. The lower the temperature, the more time the steers were observed lying down (P < 0·01). ‘Moving’ increased with increasing temperature (P < 0·05) as well as with increasing wind speed (P < 0·01). During the grazing period following the experiment, the former outdoor steers grew significantly (P < 0·05) better than the former indoor steers. However, there was no significant difference in overall growth rate from start to slaughter. This study suggests that the winter climate in this part of Sweden (latitude 60°N) did not affect in a negative way the welfare or the growth rate of steers kept outdoors.

No abstract

In order to study the effect of day length and temperature on performance, data from 495 growing, non-castrated bulls of the Swedish Red and White breed were analysed. Groups of 11 bulls were housed in either an insulated building in pens having slatted floors or in an uninsulated building with pens having both a deep straw bed and a concrete floor. The majority of the bulls (330) were given a concentrate diet ad libitum, while the remainder (165) were given grass silage ad libitum supplemented with concentrate. Energy intake, live-weight gain, housing temperature, day length and change in day length were calculated as 14-day period means for the two housing systems. Regression analyses showed that live-weight gain was associated with increasing day length in bulls on both feeding treatments. For bulls given concentrate ad libitum, metabolizable energy intake was associated with increasing day length. The intake of heavier animals was more influenced by day length than that of those which were lighter. The seasonal influence on daily energy intake in bulls given silage did not show the same pattern as for bulls given concentrate ad libitum. The intake was highest in June and lowest in December for the bulls given concentrate but for the bulls given silage it was highest in August, September and October and lowest in March and April. This was due to the varying quality of the grass silage over the year. No effect or very little effect of temperature or housing system on energy intake or on weight gain was found.

Housing of young bulls in slatted floor buildings can be detrimental to their health and behaviour and thus to their welfare. Small space allowances, slippery flooring and hard floor surfaces influence the animals negatively. The feeding system often involves concentrate ad libitum feeding which also might be detrimental to health. However, the surface of concrete and slatted floors can be softened by rubber coating of the slats, and the space allowance can be increased by lowering stocking density. But alternative systems seem to increase the welfare of the animals. Bedded pens often improve health and behaviour, without lessening production. If straw is scarce, using divided pens with both bedding and a concrete floor or a sloped solid floor saves bedding. Housing might not be necessary at all since growing bulls can tolerate very low temperatures without any negative influence on performance and health. Providing simple sheds is a cheap alternative that allows much behavioural freedom. However, the environmental impact of these systems is not clear.