Background and aimThe eradication of H. pylori infection using PPI associated with different combinations of two or three antibiotics entails high risks of side effects and non- adherence. Therefore probiotics have been proposed for H. pylori eradication.We tested the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri plus Pantoprazole compared to a triple regimen based on Pantoprazole plus Amoxicillin plus Clarithromycin in patients with H. pylori infection and functional dyspepsia.MethodsIn a prospective design, 46 patients (M: 13, F: 33, mean age 48.80 ± 13.82 years) fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: age at least 18, documented informed consent, positive H. pylori finding by histology, no morphological changes of the gastric mucosa at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and complaints of functional dyspepsia according to the Rome III criteria. Exclusion criteria were: presence of any other chronic organic diseases that required drug treatment, use of antibiotics, PPIs or H2 antagonists in the previous 3 months; pregnancy or lactation. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups (23 patients each group). One group received the standard therapy in our area: Pantoprazole 40 mg bid for 30 days associated with Amoxicillin 2×1000 mg/day and Clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 14 days. The other group received Pantoprazole 40 mg/day plus L. reuteri DSMZ 17648 twice a day for 8 weeks. Post-treatment eradication was tested by H. pylori antigen stool assay at 30 days after therapy.ResultsThe group on L. reuteri plus Pantoprazole presented 65.22% eradication rate compared to 73.91% cure rate in the group that received the Pantoprazole and Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin therapy, with no statistically significant difference in eradication rate between the two groups (p=0.75). The total adherence was good and eradication of H. pylori was associated with improvement of dyspeptic symptoms for both eradication regimens.ConclusionL. reuteri is a good alternative for patients with chronic dyspepsia for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Its efficacy is similar to the triple therapy.
To investigate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) long-axis strain (LAS) and LV sphericity index (LVSI) and outcomes in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and myocardial replacement fibrosis confirmed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), we conducted a prospective study on 178 patients (48 ± 14.4 years; 25.2% women) with first NIDCM diagnosis. The evaluation protocol included ECG monitoring, echocardiography and cMRI. LAS and LVSI were cMRI-determined. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite outcome including heart failure (HF), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). After a median follow-up of 17 months, patients with LGE+ had increased risk of MACEs. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher rate of MACEs in patients with LGE+ (p < 0.001), increased LVSI (p < 0.01) and decreased LAS (p < 0.001). In Cox analysis, LAS (HR = 1.32, 95%CI (1.54–9.14), p = 0.001), LVSI [HR = 1.17, 95%CI (1.45–7.19), p < 0.01] and LGE+ (HR = 1.77, 95%CI (2.79–12.51), p < 0.0001) were independent predictors for MACEs. In a 4-point risk scoring system based on LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%, LGE+, LAS > −7.8% and LVSI > 0.48%, patients with 3 and 4 points had a significantly higher risk for MACEs. LAS and LVSI are independent predictors of MACEs and provide incremental value beyond LVEF and LGE+ in patients with NIDCM and myocardial fibrosis.
Left atrial (LA) geometry and phasic functions are frequently impaired in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can accurately measure LA function and geometry parameters. We sought to investigate their prognostic role in patients with NIDCM. We prospectively examined 212 patients with NIDCM (49 ± 14.2-year-old; 73.5% males) and 106 healthy controls. LA volumes, phasic functions, geometry, and fibrosis were determined using CMR. A composite outcome (cardiac death, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, heart failure hospitalization) was ascertained over a median of 26 months. LA phasic functions, sphericity index (LASI) and late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) were considerably impaired in the diseased group (p < 0.001) and significantly correlated with impaired LV function parameters (p < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, LA volumes, LASI, LA total strain (LA-εt) and LA-LGE were associated with increased risk of composite outcome (p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly higher risk of composite endpoint for LA volumes (all p < 0.01), LASI > 0.725 (p < 0.003), and LA-εt < 30% (p < 0.0001). Stepwise Cox proportional-hazards models demonstrated a considerable incremental predictive value which resulted by adding LASI to LA-εt (Chi-square = 10.2, p < 0.001), and afterwards LA-LGE (Chi-Square = 15.8; p < 0.0001). NIDCM patients with defective LA volumes, LASI, LA-LGE and LA-εt had a higher risk for an outcome. LA-εt, LASI and LA-LGE provided independent incremental predictive value for outcome.
The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common chronic gastrointestinal disorder referred to gastroenterologists. One of the most common manifestations of IBS is bloating. Abdominal bloating is defined as subjective sensation of abdominal distension associated with girth increment. Therefore, it is described in the Rome IV criteria as bloating/abdominal distension. Bloating symptoms are reported by 10-30% of the general population and it was rated as the most bothersome symptom by 60% of IBS patients; the lack of specificity of this complaint prevented bloating to be included between the diagnostic criteria for IBS. Indeed, bloating may be reported also in healthy people or in other functional conditions. This paper looks to the evolutions of the concepts on bloating according to the Rome working groups from the beginning until now and it represents a comprehensive review on the prevalence and pathogenesis of bloating.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.