Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam tindak pidana korupsi, serta mengkaji dan menganalisis limitative kewenangan jaksa dalam tindak pidana korupsi, sudahkah mencerminkan adanya kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan sesuai dengan tujuan hukum di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (Statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, Jaksa berwenang melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan. Hal-hal yang menjadi limitatif kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. This paper aims to determine the regulation of the authority of the public prosecutor in criminal acts of corruption, and to study and analyze the limitative authority of prosecoturs in criminal acts of corruption, has it reflected the existence of legal certainty, justice and usefulness in accordance with the legal objectives in Indonesia. The method used in this paper uses the normative legal research method with the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that in handling corruption, the prosecutor has the authority to conduct investigations, investigations and prosecutions. Matters which become the limitative authority of public prosecutors in handling corruption are regulated inKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2004 concerning the attorney general of the republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 concerning eradication of criminal acts.

Article 28E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states "Every person shall be free to choose and to practice the religion of his/her choice, to choose one’s education, to choose one’s employment, to choose one’s citizenship, and to choose one’s place of residence within the state territory, to leave it and to subsequently return to it.” In paragraph (2), everyone has the right to the freedom to believe in his/her beliefs, to express his/her views and thoughts, according to his/her conscience. The constitutional guarantees for believers can also be seen in Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution stating that the state shall be based upon the One and Only God and the State guarantees all persons the freedom of worship, each according to his/her own religion or belief. The Constitutional Court affirms that the right to adhere to a religion or belief in God Almighty is a citizen's constitutional right, not a gift from the state. Therefore, the state is obliged to protect and guarantee the fulfillment of the rights of it’s the citizens to embrace a belief other than the six religions developed in Indonesia. However, in practice the dissolution of beliefs is actually carried out by community organizations. In this study, two things will be discussed namely: 1) What is the legal position of adherents of belief in the national legal system? 2) Do community organizations have the authority to dissolve religious beliefs? This research is normative juridical research, in which the problems in this research are analyzed qualitatively.

This study aims (1) to analyze and find out the efforts to resolve genocide disputes from the perspective of international criminal law, (2) to determine the comparison of resolving genocide disputes that occurred in Rwanda and Myanmar. This type of research uses normative legal research, namely literature study, rules and literature related to genocide, and uses an argumentative descriptive approach. The results of this study explain the efforts and comparisons of resolving genocide disputes that occurred in Rwanda and Myanmar from the perspective of international criminal law. Genocide is an international crime that aims to eliminate ethnicity, ethnicity, race and religion in a systematic and structured manner. Efforts to resolve disputes are carried out in an international criminal manner and are handled by the International Criminal Court. The International Criminal Court is the highest judicial institution, and has the authority to handle international cases. comparative law is a method of investigation with the aim of obtaining deeper knowledge about certain legal materials. Comparative law is not a set of rules and legal principles and is not a branch of law, but is a technique for dealing with foreign legal elements from a legal problem. Court. The International Criminal Court is the highest judicial institution, and has the authority to handle international cases

Along with the development of law and the community needs that developed rapidly, especially in the globalization era besides the enhancement of public demand for business development in accordance with good corporate governance principles,

Penelitian bertujuan untuk memberikan guideline perancangan arsitektur enterprise sistem e-ticketing kereta api di Indonesia berorientasi service dengan menggunakan kerangka Service Oriented Enterprise Architecture (SOEA). Metodologi analis dan desain berorientasi objek (OOAD) digunakan dalam menggambarkan struktur perancangan sistem e-ticketing kereta api. Sedangkan kerangka perancangan arsitektur enterprise e-ticketing kereta api berorientasi service terdiri dari analisis arsitektur as-is yang menganalisis arsitektur yang sedang berjalan, dilanjutkan dengan perancangan arsitektur to-be untuk merancang arsitektur yang akan dikembangkan baik dari segi proses bisnis, aplikasi, dan infrastruktur. Perancangan arsitektur enterprise e-ticketing kereta api berbasis service juga menggunakan pola aristektur berbasis microservice dalam rangka memenuhi kebutuhan sistem yang resilient, scalable, interoperable, dan mampu diintegrasikan dengan berbagai standar platform.