Abstract. A Lagrangian approach has been used to assess the degree of chemically induced ozone loss in the Arctic lower stratosphere in winter 1991/1992. Trajectory calculations are used to identify air parcels probed by two ozonesondes at different points along the trajectories. A statistical analysis of the measured differences in ozone mixing ratio and the time the air parcel spent in sunlight between the measurements provides the chemical ozone loss. Initial results were first described by von der Gathen et al. [1995]. Here we present a more detailed description of the technique and a more comprehensive discussion of the results. Ozone loss rates of up to 10 ppbv per sunlit hour (or 54 ppbv per day) were found inside the polar vortex on the 475 K potential temperature surface (about 19.5 km in altitude) at the end of January. The period of rapid ozone loss coincides and slightly lags a period when temperatures were cold enough for type I polar stratospheric clouds to form. It is shown that the ozone loss occurs exclusively during the sunlit portions of the trajectories. The time evolution and vertical distribution of the ozone loss rates are discussed.
Abstract. The winter 1996/97 was quite unusual with late vortex formation and polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) development and subsequent record low temperatures in March. Ozone depletion in the Arctic vortex is determined using ozonesondes. The diabatic cooling is calculated with PV-theta mapped ozone mixing ratios and the large ozone depletions, especially at the center of the vortex where most PSC existence was predicted, enhances the diabatic cooling by up to 80%. The average vortex chemical ozone depletion from January 6 to April 6 is 33, 46, 46, 43, 35. 33. 32 and 21% in air masses ending at 375,400, 425, 450, 475. 500, 525, and 550 K (about 14 -22 km). This depletion is corrected for transport of ozone across the vortex edge calculated with reverse domain-filling trajectories. 375 K is in fact below the vortex, but the calculation method is applicable at this level with small changes. The column integrated chemical ozone depletion amounts to about 92 DU (21%), which is comparable to the depletions observed during the previous four winters.
Ozone observations from ozonesondes, the lidars aboard the DC‐8, in situ ozone measurements from the ER‐2, and satellite ozone measurements from Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM) were used to assess ozone loss during the Sage III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE) and Third European Stratospheric Experiment on Ozone (THESEO) 1999–2000 Arctic campaign. Two methods of analysis were used. In the first method a simple regression analysis of the data time series is performed on the ozonesonde and POAM measurements within the vortex. In the second method the ozone measurements from all available ozone data were injected into a free‐running diabatic trajectory model and were carried forward in time from 1 December to 15 March. Vortex ozone loss was then estimated by comparing the ozone values of those parcels initiated early in the campaign with those parcels injected later in the campaign. Despite the variety of observational techniques used during SOLVE, the measurements provide a fairly consistent picture. Over the whole vortex the largest ozone loss occurs between 550 and 400 K potential temperatures (∼23–16 km) with over 1.5 ppmv (∼55%) lost by 15 March, the end of the SOLVE mission period. An ozone loss rate of 0.04–0.05 ppmv/day was computed for 15 March. The total column loss was between 44 and 57 DU or 11–15%. Ozonesondes launched after 15 March suggest that an additional 0.5 ppmv or more ozone was lost between 15 March and 1 April.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.